» Articles » PMID: 28126547

Single-Surgeon Learning Curve in 111 Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomies: Does Operative Time Tell the Whole Story?

Overview
Journal J Am Coll Surg
Date 2017 Jan 28
PMID 28126547
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is becoming the standard treatment for left-sided pancreatic disease. Learning curve identification is essential to ensure a safe and steady expansion. However, large (n > 30) single-surgeon learning curve series are lacking.

Study Design: Data of all patients undergoing LDP between June 2007 and March 2016 by a single surgeon were collected prospectively. For learning curve analysis, the first 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 LDPs were compared with LDPs performed thereafter.

Results: In total, 111 LDPs were performed, of which 2 (2%) were converted. Median operative time was 200 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 150 to 245 minutes) and median blood loss was 200 mL (IQR 100 to 300 mL). Learning curve analysis did not show improvements in operative time or blood loss. However, the number of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma increased after 30 cases and a significant reduction of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications was seen; from 30% (n = 9) for cases 1 to 30 to 5% (n = 4) for cases 31 to 111 (p < 0.001). Similarly, the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula grade B/C fistulas (33% [n = 10] vs 9% [n = 7]; p = 0.001) and percutaneous drainage rate (23% [n = 7] vs 4% [n = 3]; p = 0.001) were lower. Hospital stay was 7 days (IQR 5 to 13 days) for cases 1 to 30 vs 5 days (IQR 4 to 6 days) for cases 31 to 111 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Operative outcomes of LDP remained stable with increasing surgical complexity over time. Postoperative outcomes, such as complications and length of hospital stay, improved after the first 30 cases. When describing learning curves, short- and long-term outcomes should be considered.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Results from the national prospective trial ROBOCOSTES.

Guerrero-Ortiz M, Sanchez-Velazquez P, Burdio F, Gimeno M, Podda M, Pellino G Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6270-6281.

PMID: 39138678 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11109-x.


Teaching modern pancreatic surgery: close relationship between centralization, innovation, and dissemination of care.

Perri G, van Hilst J, Li S, Besselink M, Hogg M, Marchegiani G BJS Open. 2023; 7(5).

PMID: 37698977 PMC: 10496870. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad081.


The influence of institutional pancreaticoduodenectomy volume on short-term outcomes in the Brazilian public health system: 2008-2021.

Szor D, Tustumi F Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023; 50:e20233569.

PMID: 37646727 PMC: 10508654. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233569-en.


Learning Curves in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Proposal of a Standardization.

Muller P, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Sinz S, Probst P, de Santibanes M Ann Surg Open. 2023; 3(1):e111.

PMID: 37600094 PMC: 10431463. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111.


Learning Curves of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy in Experienced Pancreatic Centers.

Lof S, Claassen L, Hannink G, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U JAMA Surg. 2023; 158(9):927-933.

PMID: 37378968 PMC: 10308297. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2279.