» Articles » PMID: 28120275

Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Jan 26
PMID 28120275
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Less invasive surgery is gaining popularity for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC), but there are no definitive guidelines for the use of less invasive surgery for the treatment of undifferentiated EGC. The aims of this meta-analysis were to identify potential predictive factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in undifferentiated EGC and to guide the personalized therapeutic modality for patients with undifferentiated EGC.

Methods: An extensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify relevant articles involving undifferentiated EGC and LNM. Eligible data were systematically reviewed through a meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: In total, 23 studies were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis found that the variables sex (female), age (greater than 60 years), tumor size (greater than 20 mm), depth of invasion (submucosal invasion), presence of lymphovascular involvement, presence of ulcer findings, histology type (non-signet ring carcinoma), and tumor location (not in the middle part of the stomach) were significantly associated with LNM.

Conclusions: Eight variables were identified as predictive factors for LNM in undifferentiated EGC. The significance of these variables should be further confirmed during the process of LNM in undifferentiated EGC patients for future clinical application.

Citing Articles

Nomograms of risk prediction and prognosis for the T1-T2 stage gastric cancer with lymph node metastasis: a population-based study.

Nie G, Geng L, Zhang H, Chu S, Jiang H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1492041.

PMID: 40070650 PMC: 11893835. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1492041.


Impact of Clinicopathological Features on Gastric Cancer Stage According to TNM Classification.

Majewska O, Pach R, Brzewski P, Kulig J, Kulig P In Vivo. 2025; 39(2):1112-1121.

PMID: 40010943 PMC: 11884451. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13916.


Rare epithelial gastric cancers: a review of the current treatment knowledge.

Petrillo A, Ottaviano M, Pompella L, Giunta E, Pisapia P, Marte G Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359241255628.

PMID: 39867743 PMC: 11760139. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241255628.


Identification of maximal tumor size associated with negligible lymph node metastasis for endoscopic submucosal dissection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

Oh S, Ahn S, Kim K, Choi M, Lee J, Sohn T Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(4):850-857.

PMID: 38658420 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01498-2.


Value of quantitative microsurface structure analysis for evaluating the invasion depth of type 0-II early gastric cancer.

Jiang Z, Liang Y, Huang P, Ning J, Qi J JGH Open. 2024; 8(4):e13055.

PMID: 38628386 PMC: 11019524. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.13055.


References
1.
Kwee R, Kwee T . Predicting lymph node status in early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2008; 11(3):134-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-008-0476-5. View

2.
Lee T, Tanaka H, Ohira M, Okita Y, Yoshii M, Sakurai K . Clinical impact of the extent of lymph node micrometastasis in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Oncology. 2014; 86(4):244-52. DOI: 10.1159/000358803. View

3.
Namieno T, Koito K, Higashi T, Takahashi M, Yamashita K, Kondo Y . Assessing the suitability of gastric carcinoma for limited resection: endoscopic prediction of lymph node metastases. World J Surg. 1998; 22(8):859-64. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900482. View

4.
Park J, Choi K, Kim M, Lee J, Song H, Lee G . Is endoscopic resection an acceptable treatment for undifferentiated EGC?. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011; 59(114):607-11. DOI: 10.5754/hge11467. View

5.
Huo Z, Chen S, Zhang J, Li H, Wu D, Zhai T . Risk clinicopathological factors for lymph node metastasis in poorly differentiated early gastric cancer and their impact on laparoscopic wedge resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(44):6489-93. PMC: 3508645. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i44.6489. View