» Articles » PMID: 28119642

Structural Principles or Frequency of Use? An ERP Experiment on the Learnability of Consonant Clusters

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Jan 26
PMID 28119642
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Phonological knowledge of a language involves knowledge about which segments can be combined under what conditions. Languages vary in the quantity and quality of licensed combinations, in particular sequences of consonants, with Polish being a language with a large inventory of such combinations. The present paper reports on a two-session experiment in which Polish-speaking adult participants learned nonce words with final consonant clusters. The aim was to study the role of two factors which potentially play a role in the learning of phonotactic structures: the phonological principle of sonority (ordering sound segments within the syllable according to their inherent loudness) and the (non-) existence as a usage-based phenomenon. EEG responses in two different time windows (adversely to behavioral responses) show linguistic processing by native speakers of Polish to be sensitive to both distinctions, in spite of the fact that Polish is rich in sonority-violating clusters. In particular, a general learning effect in terms of an N400 effect was found which was demonstrated to be different for sonority-obeying clusters than for sonority-violating clusters. Furthermore, significant interactions of formedness and session, and of existence and session, demonstrate that both factors, the sonority principle and the frequency pattern, play a role in the learning process.

Citing Articles

Behavioral and Neurodynamic Effects of Word Learning on Phonotactic Repair.

Gow D, Schoenhaut A, Avcu E, Ahlfors S Front Psychol. 2021; 12:590155.

PMID: 33776832 PMC: 7987836. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590155.


The Sense of Sounds: Brain Responses to Phonotactic Frequency, Phonological Grammar and Lexical Meaning.

Silva S, Vigario M, Fernandez B, Jeronimo R, Alter K, Frota S Front Psychol. 2019; 10:681.

PMID: 30984081 PMC: 6447827. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00681.

References
1.
Redford M . Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics. Cognition. 2008; 107(3):785-816. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.014. View

2.
Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Giard M, Echallier J, Pernier J . ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):235-60. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563373. View

3.
Marslen-Wilson W . Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition. 1987; 25(1-2):71-102. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9. View

4.
Maess B, Schroger E, Widmann A . High-pass filters and baseline correction in M/EEG analysis-continued discussion. J Neurosci Methods. 2016; 266:171-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.01.016. View

5.
Berent I, Lennertz T, Jun J, Moreno M, Smolensky P . Language universals in human brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(14):5321-5. PMC: 2291138. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801469105. View