» Articles » PMID: 28118415

Comparative Quantitative Studies on the Microvasculature of the Heart of a Highly Selected Meat-Type and a Wild-Type Turkey Line

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Jan 25
PMID 28118415
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study the macroscopic and microscopic structure of the heart of a fast growing, meat-type turkey line (British United turkeys BUT Big 6) and a wild-type turkey line (Canadian Wild turkey) were compared. At 8 and 16 weeks of age, 10 birds of each genotype and sex were sampled. The body mass and heart mass of the meat-type turkey both increased at a faster rate than those of the wild-type turkey. However in both turkey lines, the relative heart mass decreased slightly with age, the decrease was statistically significant only in the male turkeys. Furthermore meat-type turkeys had a significantly (p < 0.01) lower relative heart mass and relative thickness of the left ventricle compared to the wild-type turkeys of the same age. The wild-type turkeys showed no significant change in the size of cardiomyocytes (cross sectional area and diameter) from 8 weeks to 16 weeks. In contrast, the size of cardiomyocytes increased significantly (p < 0.001) with age in the meat-type turkeys. The number of capillaries in the left ventricular wall increased significantly (p < 0.001) in wild-type turkeys from 2351 per mm2 at the age of 8 weeks to 2843 per mm2 at 16 weeks. However, in the meat-type turkeys there were no significant changes, capillary numbers being 2989 per mm2 at age 8 weeks and 2915 per mm2 at age 16 weeks. Correspondingly the area occupied by capillaries in the myocardium increased in wild-type turkeys from 8.59% at the age of 8 weeks to 9.15% at 16 weeks, whereas in meat-type turkeys this area decreased from 10.4% at 8 weeks to 9.95% at 16 weeks. Our results indicate a mismatch in development between body mass and heart mass and a compromised cardiac capillary density and architecture in the meat-type turkeys in comparison to the wild-type turkeys.

Citing Articles

Gastrointestinal Tract Morphometrics and Content of Commercial and Indigenous Chicken Breeds with Differing Ranging Profiles.

Marchewka J, Sztandarski P, Zdanowska-Sasiadek Z, Adamek-Urbanska D, Damaziak K, Wojciechowski F Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34202789 PMC: 8300197. DOI: 10.3390/ani11071881.


Heart ventricular histology and microvasculature together with aortic histology and elastic lamellar structure: A comparison of a novel dual-purpose to a broiler chicken line.

Harash G, Richardson K, Alshamy Z, Hunigen H, Hafez H, Plendl J PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214158.

PMID: 30897149 PMC: 6428391. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214158.


Comparison of the gastrointestinal tract of a dual-purpose to a broiler chicken line: A qualitative and quantitative macroscopic and microscopic study.

Alshamy Z, Richardson K, Hunigen H, Hafez H, Plendl J, Al Masri S PLoS One. 2018; 13(10):e0204921.

PMID: 30339691 PMC: 6195275. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204921.

References
1.
Batra S, RAKUSAN K, Campbell S . Geometry of capillary networks in hypertrophied rat heart. Microvasc Res. 1991; 41(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1016/0026-2862(91)90005-v. View

2.
Millan J, Gortazar C, Villafuerte R . Marked differences in the splanchnometry of farm-bred and wild red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa L.). Poult Sci. 2001; 80(7):972-5. DOI: 10.1093/ps/80.7.972. View

3.
Nestor K, Anderson J, Hartzler D, Velleman S . Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkeys. 4. Body shape and carcass traits. Poult Sci. 2006; 84(12):1825-34. DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.12.1825. View

4.
Romvari R, Petrasi Z, Suto Z, Szabo A, Andrassy G, Garamvolgyi R . Noninvasive characterization of the turkey heart performance and its relationship to skeletal muscle volume. Poult Sci. 2004; 83(4):696-700. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.4.696. View

5.
Panisello P, Torrella J, Pages T, Viscor G . Capillary supply and fiber morphometry in rat myocardium after intermittent exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. High Alt Med Biol. 2007; 8(4):322-30. DOI: 10.1089/ham.2007.1030. View