» Articles » PMID: 28117354

Identification of Consensus Biomarkers for Predicting Non-genotoxic Hepatocarcinogens

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jan 25
PMID 28117354
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The assessment of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGHCs) is currently relying on two-year rodent bioassays. Toxicogenomics biomarkers provide a potential alternative method for the prioritization of NGHCs that could be useful for risk assessment. However, previous studies using inconsistently classified chemicals as the training set and a single microarray dataset concluded no consensus biomarkers. In this study, 4 consensus biomarkers of A2m, Ca3, Cxcl1, and Cyp8b1 were identified from four large-scale microarray datasets of the one-day single maximum tolerated dose and a large set of chemicals without inconsistent classifications. Machine learning techniques were subsequently applied to develop prediction models for NGHCs. The final bagging decision tree models were constructed with an average AUC performance of 0.803 for an independent test. A set of 16 chemicals with controversial classifications were reclassified according to the consensus biomarkers. The developed prediction models and identified consensus biomarkers are expected to be potential alternative methods for prioritization of NGHCs for further experimental validation.

Citing Articles

Incorporating Tissue-Specific Gene Expression Data to Improve Chemical-Disease Inference of in Silico Toxicogenomics Methods.

Wang S, Wang C, Wang C, Lin Y, Tung C J Xenobiot. 2024; 14(3):1023-1035.

PMID: 39189172 PMC: 11348041. DOI: 10.3390/jox14030057.


Performance evaluation of E-nose and E-tongue combined with machine learning for qualitative and quantitative assessment of bear bile powder.

Lei K, Yuan M, Li S, Zhou Q, Li M, Zeng D Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023; 415(17):3503-3513.

PMID: 37199792 PMC: 10192783. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04740-5.


Machine learning-based biomarkers identification from toxicogenomics - Bridging to regulatory relevant phenotypic endpoints.

Rahman S, Lan J, Kaeli D, Dy J, Alshawabkeh A, Gu A J Hazard Mater. 2021; 423(Pt B):127141.

PMID: 34560480 PMC: 9628282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127141.


DIscBIO: A User-Friendly Pipeline for Biomarker Discovery in Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

Ghannoum S, Leoncio Netto W, Fantini D, Ragan-Kelley B, Parizadeh A, Jonasson E Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(3).

PMID: 33573289 PMC: 7866810. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031399.


Identification of Time-Invariant Biomarkers for Non-Genotoxic Hepatocarcinogen Assessment.

Huang S, Lin Y, Tung C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12).

PMID: 32560183 PMC: 7345770. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124298.


References
1.
Lin N, Wu B, Jansen R, Gerstein M, Zhao H . Information assessment on predicting protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004; 5:154. PMC: 529436. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-154. View

2.
LAbbate A, KLASSEN G . Evidence of carbonic anhydrase activity in skeletal muscle: a role for facilitative carbon dioxide transport. Respir Physiol. 1974; 21(3):341-50. DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(74)90064-4. View

3.
Plant N . Can systems toxicology identify common biomarkers of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis?. Toxicology. 2008; 254(3):164-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.001. View

4.
Kanki M, Gi M, Fujioka M, Wanibuchi H . Detection of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens and prediction of their mechanism of action in rats using gene marker sets. J Toxicol Sci. 2016; 41(2):281-92. DOI: 10.2131/jts.41.281. View

5.
Auerbach S, Shah R, Mav D, Smith C, Walker N, Vallant M . Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009; 243(3):300-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.11.021. View