» Articles » PMID: 28115055

Dyslexics' Faster Decay of Implicit Memory for Sounds and Words is Manifested in Their Shorter Neural Adaptation

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jan 25
PMID 28115055
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dyslexia is a prevalent reading disability whose underlying mechanisms are still disputed. We studied the neural mechanisms underlying dyslexia using a simple frequency-discrimination task. Though participants were asked to compare the two tones in each trial, implicit memory of previous trials affected their responses. We hypothesized that implicit memory decays faster among dyslexics. We tested this by increasing the temporal intervals between consecutive trials, and by measuring the behavioral impact and ERP responses from the auditory cortex. Dyslexics showed a faster decay of implicit memory effects on both measures, with similar time constants. Finally, faster decay of implicit memory also characterized the impact of sound regularities in benefitting dyslexics' oral reading rate. Their benefit decreased faster as a function of the time interval from the previous reading of the same non-word. We propose that dyslexics' shorter neural adaptation paradoxically accounts for their longer reading times, since it reduces their temporal window of integration of past stimuli, resulting in noisier and less reliable predictions for both simple and complex stimuli. Less reliable predictions limit their acquisition of reading expertise.

Citing Articles

Neural tracking of auditory statistical regularities in adults with and without dyslexia.

Ringer H, Sammler D, Daikoku T Cereb Cortex. 2025; 35(2).

PMID: 40037410 PMC: 11879346. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf042.


Unifying network model links recency and central tendency biases in working memory.

Boboeva V, Pezzotta A, Clopath C, Akrami A Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38656279 PMC: 11042808. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.86725.


Reduced categorical learning of faces in dyslexia.

Gertsovski A, Guri O, Ahissar M Cortex. 2024; 173:80-95.

PMID: 38387376 PMC: 10988772. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.005.


The Influence of Memory on Visual Perception in Infants, Children, and Adults.

Jaffe-Dax S, Potter C, Leung T, Emberson L, Lew-Williams C Cogn Sci. 2023; 47(11):e13381.

PMID: 37988257 PMC: 10754275. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13381.


Effect of presentation rate on auditory processing in Rett syndrome: event-related potential study.

Kostanian D, Rebreikina A, Voinova V, Sysoeva O Mol Autism. 2023; 14(1):40.

PMID: 37885019 PMC: 10605980. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-023-00566-1.


References
1.
McAnally K, Stein J . Auditory temporal coding in dyslexia. Proc Biol Sci. 1996; 263(1373):961-5. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0142. View

2.
Beneventi H, Tonnessen F, Ersland L, Hugdahl K . Working memory deficit in dyslexia: behavioral and FMRI evidence. Int J Neurosci. 2010; 120(1):51-9. DOI: 10.3109/00207450903275129. View

3.
Boets B, Wouters J, van Wieringen A, Ghesquiere P . Auditory processing, speech perception and phonological ability in pre-school children at high-risk for dyslexia: a longitudinal study of the auditory temporal processing theory. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(8):1608-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.009. View

4.
McArthur G, Bishop D . Speech and non-speech processing in people with specific language impairment: a behavioural and electrophysiological study. Brain Lang. 2005; 94(3):260-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.002. View

5.
Baddeley A . Working memory. Curr Biol. 2010; 20(4):R136-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014. View