» Articles » PMID: 28111554

On Dreams and Motivation: Comparison of Freud's and Hobson's Views

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Jan 24
PMID 28111554
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The merits of Freudian dream theory continue to be debated and both supporters and critics appeal to empirical evidence to support their respective positions. What receives much less attention is the theoretical coherency of either Freudian dream theory or alternative perspectives. This paper examines Freudian dream theory and J. Allan Hobson's alternative position by addressing the role of motivation in dreams. This paper first discusses motivation in Freudian theory and its relation to dreams and disguise-censorship. The role of motivation in Hobson's theory is then considered. Hobson's claim that dream plot and content selection is random and based on design error and functional imbalance is then discussed in relation to the protoconsciousness theory proposal that dreams serve an adaptive function. While there are apparent inconsistencies in Hobson's position, his appeal to emotions and instincts provides a preliminary platform for understanding the role of motivation in dreams that is consonant with the Freudian position.

References
1.
Phillips A, Ahn S, Howland J . Amygdalar control of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system: parallel pathways to motivated behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003; 27(6):543-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.09.002. View

2.
Perogamvros L, Dang-Vu T, Desseilles M, Schwartz S . Sleep and dreaming are for important matters. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:474. PMC: 3722492. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00474. View

3.
Solms M . Dreaming and REM sleep are controlled by different brain mechanisms. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 23(6):843-50; discussion 904-1121. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00003988. View

4.
Brooks A, Berns G . Aversive stimuli and loss in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(6):281-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.001. View

5.
Boag S . Ego, drives, and the dynamics of internal objects. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:666. PMC: 4076885. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00666. View