» Articles » PMID: 28111425

CA19-9 or CEA Decline After the First Cycle of Treatment Predicts Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Treated with S-1 and Cisplatin Chemotherapy

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jan 24
PMID 28111425
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: While tumor markers (carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA 19-9] and carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) can aid in the diagnosis of biliary tract cancer, their prognostic role has not been clearly elucidated. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic role of tumor markers and tumor marker change in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Materials And Methods: Patients with pathologically proven metastatic or relapsed biliary tract cancer who were treated in a phase II trial of first-line S-1 and cisplatin chemotherapy were enrolled. Serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and after the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Results: Among a total of 104 patients, 80 (77%) had elevated baseline tumor markers (69 with CA 19-9 elevation and 40 with CEA). A decline ≥ 30% of the elevated tumor marker level after the first cycle of chemotherapy conferred an improved time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and better chemotherapy response. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor marker decline as an independent positive prognostic factor of TTP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; p=0.003) and OS (adjusted HR, 0.37; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed similar results in each group of patients with CA 19-9 elevation and CEA elevation. In addition, elevated baseline CEA was associated with poor survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: Tumor marker decline was associated with improved survival in biliary tract cancer. Measuring tumor marker after the first cycle of chemotherapy can be used as an early assessment of treatment outcome.

Citing Articles

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab plus a PD-1 inhibitor for gallbladder cancer with hepatic oligometastasis: a real-world study.

Zhao W, Yao Z, Li J, Li W, Dou Q, Zhao X J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024; 15(1):330-345.

PMID: 38482216 PMC: 10932672. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-816.


Neoadjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei-A Novel Treatment Approach.

Prabhu A, Brandl A, Wakama S, Sako S, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(8).

PMID: 32784670 PMC: 7465601. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082212.


Efficacy of interventional therapy and effect on inflammatory factors in patients with gastric cancer after chemotherapy.

Wu P, Wang J Oncol Lett. 2019; 18(2):1733-1744.

PMID: 31423240 PMC: 6607250. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10505.


Therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors in unresectable gallbladder cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin.

You M, Ryu J, Choi Y, Choi J, Huh G, Paik W BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1):10.

PMID: 30611225 PMC: 6321682. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5211-y.

References
1.
Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer D, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A . Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(14):1273-81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721. View

2.
Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, Togawa O, Kogure H, Ito Y . Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010; 67(4):847-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1360-7. View

3.
Sasaki T, Isayama H, Nakai Y, Koike K . Current status of chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. Korean J Intern Med. 2013; 28(5):515-24. PMC: 3759755. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2013.28.5.515. View

4.
Harder J, Kummer O, Olschewski M, Otto F, Blum H, Opitz O . Prognostic relevance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(10):2097-100. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0155. View

5.
Ramage J, Donaghy A, Farrant J, Iorns R, Williams R . Serum tumor markers for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 1995; 108(3):865-9. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90462-x. View