» Articles » PMID: 28108798

Augmented Perineal Urethrostomy Using a Dorsal Buccal Mucosal Graft, Bi-institutional Study

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Jan 22
PMID 28108798
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To present our technique and outcomes for perineal urethrostomy augmented with a dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft (BMG). Results from initial series and collaboration from an international center are included.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all adult patients who underwent urethral reconstruction with perineal urethrostomy utilizing a buccal mucosal graft between January 1, 2002 and January 1, 2013 was performed. All surgeries were performed by three surgeons using the same technique (GHJ, KAM, and RV). Success was defined as no need for additional treatment following definitive surgery.

Results: A total of 44 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 60 (range 44-81) years. All strictures were pananterior. Etiologies included unknown in 16 (36%), failed hypospadias repair in six (14%), lichen sclerosus in ten (23%), iatrogenic in seven (16%), Fournier's in three (7%), urethral cancer in one (2%) and penile cancer in one (2%). Mean follow-up was 45 (range 6-136) months. Overall success was 80%. Nine patients recurred, of which four had a successful revision, two are awaiting potential revision, and three are being managed with periodic dilations.

Conclusions: BMG perineal urethrostomy is a valid alternative for complex urethral strictures due to lichen sclerosus, previous failed reconstructions or hypospadias cripples. Midterm results are encouraging for this novel technique.

Citing Articles

Description of Transperineostomal Resection of the Prostate: A Case Report.

Funk L, Hefermehl L, Hofmann S, Nikitin A, Bieri U Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65026.

PMID: 39165441 PMC: 11334225. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65026.


Analysis of prognostic factors of failure in perineal urethrostomy.

Ponce de Leon J, Salas D, Calderon J, Montlleo M, Palou J World J Urol. 2023; 41(4):1109-1115.

PMID: 36932283 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04343-w.


Perineal urethrostomy with combined buccal mucosal graft and skin flap after complete loss of anterior urethra.

Akagi N, Kanematsu A, Yamamoto S IJU Case Rep. 2021; 4(2):92-94.

PMID: 33718814 PMC: 7924087. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12251.


Current treatment of lichen sclerosus and stricture.

Chung A, Suarez O World J Urol. 2019; 38(12):3061-3067.

PMID: 31807846 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03030-z.

References
1.
Andrich D, Dunglison N, Greenwell T, Mundy A . The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol. 2003; 170(1):90-2. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000069820.81726.00. View

2.
Dubey D, Sehgal A, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kapoor R, Kumar A . Buccal mucosal urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans related urethral strictures: the outcome of 1 and 2-stage techniques. J Urol. 2005; 173(2):463-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000149740.02408.19. View

3.
Palminteri E, Brandes S, Djordjevic M . Urethral reconstruction in lichen sclerosus. Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22(6):478-83. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328358191c. View

4.
French D, Hudak S, Morey A . The "7-flap" perineal urethrostomy. Urology. 2011; 77(6):1487-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.053. View

5.
Myers J, McAninch J . Perineal urethrostomy. BJU Int. 2011; 107(5):856-865. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10139.x. View