» Articles » PMID: 28108229

Vaccine Shot-limiting: Estimating the Prevalence, Indicators, and Impact on Vaccination Status - Michigan, 2012

Overview
Journal Vaccine
Date 2017 Jan 22
PMID 28108229
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Concerns regarding vaccine safety and pain have prompted certain parents to limit the number of shots their child receives per visit. We estimated the prevalence of shot-limited children in Michigan, described their characteristics, assessed whether shot-limited children were up-to-date on recommended vaccinations, and investigated possible intervention points for vaccination education.

Methods: We analyzed vaccination registry and birth record data of children born in Michigan during 2012 who had ⩾2 vaccination visits, with ⩾1 visits after age 5months. Shot-limited was defined as receiving ⩽2 shots at all visits through age 24months. Nonlimited children received >2 shots at ⩾1 visits. Up-to-date vaccination was based on receipt of a seven-vaccine series and was determined at ages 24months and 35months. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated using risk regression.

Results: Of 101,443 children, a total of 2,967 (3%) children were shot-limited. Mothers of shot-limited children were more likely to be white (RR: 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.2), college graduate (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.9-2.0), and married (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.5-1.5). Compared with nonlimited children, shot-limited children were more likely to be born in a nonhospital setting (RR: 11.7; 95% CI: 9.4-14.6) and have a midwife attendant (RR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.7-2.1). Shot-limited children were less likely to be up-to-date on recommended vaccinations (RR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.2-0.3); this association was stronger for those with a midwife birth attendant (RR: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.2) rather than a medical doctor (RR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2-0.3).

Conclusions: Shot-limited children are less likely to be up-to-date on vaccinations, possibly leading to increased risk for vaccine-preventable diseases. This association was stronger for those with a midwife birth attendant. This analysis should prompt targeted education, such as to midwives, concerning risks associated with shot-limiting behavior.

Citing Articles

Changes in vaccination practices among infants after the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib combination vaccines.

Kim H, Park S, Jeong N, Choi N Vaccine X. 2024; 18:100484.

PMID: 38655547 PMC: 11035106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100484.


Temporal Trends in Undervaccination: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Daley M, Reifler L, Shoup J, Narwaney K, Kharbanda E, Groom H Am J Prev Med. 2021; 61(1):64-72.

PMID: 34148627 PMC: 8899861. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.037.


Development of a US trust measure to assess and monitor parental confidence in the vaccine system.

Frew P, Murden R, Mehta C, Chamberlain A, Hinman A, Nowak G Vaccine. 2018; 37(2):325-332.

PMID: 30503657 PMC: 6573024. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.043.

References
1.
McNutt L, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner J . Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(10):940-3. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg074. View

2.
Offit P, Jew R . Addressing parents' concerns: do vaccines contain harmful preservatives, adjuvants, additives, or residuals?. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(6 Pt 1):1394-7. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.6.1394. View

3.
Leask J, Quinn H, Macartney K, Trent M, Massey P, Carr C . Immunisation attitudes, knowledge and practices of health professionals in regional NSW. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008; 32(3):224-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00220.x. View

4.
Smith P, Humiston S, Parnell T, Vannice K, Salmon D . The association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely childhood vaccination coverage. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(4):534-41. PMC: 2882604. DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500408. View

5.
Glanz J, McClure D, OLeary S, Narwaney K, Magid D, Daley M . Parental decline of pneumococcal vaccination and risk of pneumococcal related disease in children. Vaccine. 2010; 29(5):994-9. PMC: 3026079. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.085. View