» Articles » PMID: 28106039

Anthropogenic Ecosystem Disturbance and the Recovery Debt

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Jan 21
PMID 28106039
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ecosystem recovery from anthropogenic disturbances, either without human intervention or assisted by ecological restoration, is increasingly occurring worldwide. As ecosystems progress through recovery, it is important to estimate any resulting deficit in biodiversity and functions. Here we use data from 3,035 sampling plots worldwide, to quantify the interim reduction of biodiversity and functions occurring during the recovery process (that is, the 'recovery debt'). Compared with reference levels, recovering ecosystems run annual deficits of 46-51% for organism abundance, 27-33% for species diversity, 32-42% for carbon cycling and 31-41% for nitrogen cycling. Our results are consistent across biomes but not across degrading factors. Our results suggest that recovering and restored ecosystems have less abundance, diversity and cycling of carbon and nitrogen than 'undisturbed' ecosystems, and that even if complete recovery is reached, an interim recovery debt will accumulate. Under such circumstances, increasing the quantity of less-functional ecosystems through ecological restoration and offsetting are inadequate alternatives to ecosystem protection.

Citing Articles

Increased but not pristine soil organic carbon stocks in restored ecosystems.

Ascenzi I, Hilbers J, van Katwijk M, Huijbregts M, Hanssen S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):637.

PMID: 39809774 PMC: 11733138. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55980-1.


Restoration of forestry-drained boreal peatland ecosystems can effectively stop and reverse ecosystem degradation.

Elo M, Kareksela S, Ovaskainen O, Abrego N, Niku J, Taskinen S Commun Earth Environ. 2024; 5(1):680.

PMID: 39610898 PMC: 11599035. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-024-01844-3.


Protection promotes energetically efficient structures in marine communities.

Tabi A, Gilarranz L, Wood S, Dunne J, Saavedra S PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(12):e1011742.

PMID: 38127830 PMC: 10769090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011742.


Network-based restoration strategies maximize ecosystem recovery.

Bhatia U, Dubey S, Gouhier T, Ganguly A Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):1256.

PMID: 38086885 PMC: 10716433. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05622-3.


Shorebirds-driven trophic cascade helps restore coastal wetland multifunctionality.

Li C, Chen J, Liao X, Ramus A, Angelini C, Liu L Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):8076.

PMID: 38057308 PMC: 10700615. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43951-3.


References
1.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther. 2009; 89(9):873-80. View

2.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

3.
Possingham H, Bode M, Klein C . Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection. PLoS Biol. 2015; 13(1):e1002052. PMC: 4308106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052. View

4.
Zhang P, Shao G, Zhao G, Le Master D, Parker G, Dunning Jr J . China's forest policy for the 21st century. Science. 2000; 288(5474):2135-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135. View

5.
Benayas J, Newton A, Diaz A, Bullock J . Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science. 2009; 325(5944):1121-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172460. View