» Articles » PMID: 28104597

Preferences About Information and Decision-making Among Older Patients with and Without Cancer

Overview
Journal Age Ageing
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2017 Jan 21
PMID 28104597
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: information of older patients with cancer is crucial to ensure optimal care.

Objectives: to compare older patients with and without cancer regarding their preferences about medical information, decision-making and surrogate designation.

Design: an intention-to-act questionnaire was completed by patients ≥70 y enroled in the ELderly CAncer PAtients cohort between January and June 2013 and by patients in the same age group enroled in a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2005 in acute geriatric wards.

Setting: Henri-Mondor Teaching Hospital in the Paris conurbation, France.

Results: the group with cancer had 133 patients [mean age, 79.6 ± 6.5 y; 54.9% women]. The main tumour sites were colorectal [24.1%], breast [23.3%] and prostate [15.8%]; 34.8% had metastases. All these patients wanted full information, 74.2% wanted to participate in decisions about their care, 87.2% would designate a family member to serve as a surrogate in life-threatening situations and 15% had already designated a surrogate. Compared to patients without cancer, those with cancer more often wanted to receive information in a life-threatening situation [93.6% versus 79.2%; P < 0.001]. Factors independently associated with patients wanting their informed consent to be obtained for all interventions were having children [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.24; 3.66; P = 0.006], higher Mini Mental State Examination score [aORper point, 1.09; 1.02; 1.17], younger age in the group without cancer [aOR>82 y vs. ≤82 y, 0.50; 0.29-0.88] and being cancer-free [≤82 y, aOR, 0.30; 0.14-0.63; >82 y, aOR, 0.41; 0.17-0.97].

Conclusion: older patients with cancer expressed a strong preference for receiving information and participating in decisions about their care.

Citing Articles

Status quo of advanced cancer patients participating in shared decision-making in China: a mixed study.

Huang S, Wang H, Xu X, Bu X, Xia Y, Liu X Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(7):380.

PMID: 37278769 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07817-0.


Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study).

Lehtomaki K, Soveri L, Osterlund E, Lamminmaki A, Uutela A, Heerva E J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240646 PMC: 10218996. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103541.


The role of self-perceived age in older adults considering adjuvant chemotherapy.

Yilmaz S, Koita F, Zittel J, Wells M, Mohile S, Wittink M J Geriatr Oncol. 2023; 14(2):101429.

PMID: 36682217 PMC: 9974899. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101429.


'They just came with the medication dispenser'- a qualitative study of elderly service users' involvement and welfare technology in public home care services.

Glomsas H, Knutsen I, Fossum M, Halvorsen K BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):245.

PMID: 33740974 PMC: 7977566. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06243-4.


Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities.

Gomez-Virseda C, de Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C BMC Med Ethics. 2020; 21(1):50.

PMID: 32605569 PMC: 7325052. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1.