» Articles » PMID: 28099690

Intimate Partner Violence and Constraints to Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Health Among Women Seeking Abortion Services in Bangladesh

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jan 19
PMID 28099690
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To understand intersections between intimate partner violence (IPV) and other constraints to women's reproductive autonomy, and the influence of IPV on reproductive health.

Methods: A secondary analysis examined cross-sectional data from a facility-based sample of women seeking abortion care (for spontaneous or induced abortion) between March 1 and October 31, 2013. Women aged 18-49 years, who received abortion services and selected a short-acting contraceptive method or no contraception completed an interviewer-administered survey after treatment. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were calculated for associations between IPV experience and potential constraints to reproductive autonomy and health outcomes.

Results: There were 457 participants included in the present analysis and 118 (25.8%) had experienced IPV in the preceding year. IPV was associated with discordance in fertility intentions with husbands/partners and in-laws, with in-law opposition to contraception, with perceived religious prohibition of contraception, and with presenting unaccompanied (all P<0.05). IPV was also associated with receiving post-abortion care after an induced abortion compared with accessing legal menstrual regulation, and with the use of medication abortion compared with manual vacuum aspiration (both P<0.05).

Conclusion: Intimate partner violence was associated with additional constraints on reproductive autonomy from husbands/partners, in-laws, and religious communities. Seeking induced abortion unaccompanied and using medication abortion could be strategies to access abortion covertly among women experiencing IPV. Ensuring women's reproductive freedom requires addressing IPV and related constraints.

Citing Articles

Casual association between social determinants of health and sexual health literacy in reproductive-aged women: a WHO model analysis.

Vakili F, Nasiri M, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Jahanfar S, Mahmoodi Z, Alamolhoda S BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):789.

PMID: 40011831 PMC: 11863530. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21896-0.


The Impact of Armed Conflict in Northern Nigeria on Reproductive Autonomy and Unmet Need for Family Planning: A Difference-in-Differences Propensity Score Matching Approach.

Vilier L, Groot W Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70435.

PMID: 39957973 PMC: 11825584. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70435.


Development and validation of the Women Autonomy Scale for measuring psychosocial freedom from conventional gender roles.

Husain W, Ijaz F, Husain M, Ammar A, Trabelsi K, Jahrami H BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):88.

PMID: 39885560 PMC: 11783771. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02393-w.


Measuring social norms of intimate partner violence to exert control over wife agency, sexuality, and reproductive autonomy: an item response modelling of the IPV-ASRA scale.

Boyce S, Minnis A, Deardorff J, McCoy S, Challa S, Johns N Reprod Health. 2023; 20(1):90.

PMID: 37316890 PMC: 10265906. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01632-w.


Multilevel analysis of factors associated with perinatal intimate partner violence among postpartum population in Southern Ethiopia.

Lamaro Abota T, Gashe F, Deyessa N Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19013.

PMID: 36347930 PMC: 9643427. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23645-4.


References
1.
Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E . Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(3):199-200. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. View

2.
Silverman J, Decker M, McCauley H, Gupta J, Miller E, Raj A . Male perpetration of intimate partner violence and involvement in abortions and abortion-related conflict. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(8):1415-7. PMC: 2901296. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.173393. View

3.
Johnston H, Oliveras E, Akhter S, Walker D . Health system costs of menstrual regulation and care for abortion complications in Bangladesh. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011; 36(4):197-204. DOI: 10.1363/3619710. View

4.
Gipson J, Hindin M . The effect of husbands' and wives' fertility preferences on the likelihood of a subsequent pregnancy, Bangladesh 1998-2003. Popul Stud (Camb). 2009; 63(2):135-46. DOI: 10.1080/00324720902859372. View

5.
Fanslow J, Whitehead A, Silva M, Robinson E . Contraceptive use and associations with intimate partner violence among a population-based sample of New Zealand women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 48(1):83-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00805.x. View