Treatment Simplification to Atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine Versus Maintenance of Atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-infected Patients: 48 Week Results from a Randomized Trial (ATLAS-M)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Combination ART (cART)-related toxicities and costs have prompted the need for treatment simplification. The ATLAS-M trial explored 48 week non-inferior efficacy of simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus maintaining three-drug atazanavir/ritonavir-based cART in virologically suppressed patients.
Methods: We performed an open-label, multicentre, randomized, non-inferiority study, enrolling HIV-infected adults on atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs, with stable HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL and CD4 + >200 cells/mm 3 . Main exclusion criteria were hepatitis B virus coinfection, past virological failure on or resistance to study drugs, recent AIDS and pregnancy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either switch to 300 mg of atazanavir/100 mg of ritonavir once daily and 300 mg of lamivudine once daily (atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm) or to continue the previous regimen (atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm). The primary study outcome was the maintenance of HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 of the ITT-exposed (ITT-e) analysis with switch = failure. The non-inferiority margin was 12%. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01599364.
Results: Between July 2011 and June 2014, 266 patients were randomized (133 to each arm). After 48 weeks, the primary study outcome was met by 119 of 133 patients (89.5%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and 106 of 133 patients (79.7%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm [difference atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine versus atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm: +9.8% (95% CI + 1.2 to + 18.4)], demonstrating non-inferiority and superior efficacy of the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm. Virological failure occurred in two (1.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine arm and six (4.5%) patients in the atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs arm, without resistance selection. A similar proportion of adverse events occurred in both arms.
Conclusions: Treatment simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir + lamivudine showed non-inferior efficacy (superiority on post-hoc analysis) and a comparable safety profile over continuing atazanavir/ritonavir + two NRTIs in virologically suppressed patients.
Helfer M, Sprinz E Braz J Infect Dis. 2024; 28(6):104463.
PMID: 39556960 PMC: 11615594. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2024.104463.
Marinosci A, Sculier D, Wandeler G, Yerly S, Stoeckle M, Bernasconi E Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(11):ofae618.
PMID: 39507885 PMC: 11540136. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae618.
Two-drug regimens for HIV treatment.
Gibas K, Kelly S, Arribas J, Cahn P, Orkin C, Daar E Lancet HIV. 2022; 9(12):e868-e883.
PMID: 36309038 PMC: 10015554. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00249-1.
Fournier A, Hocqueloux L, Braun D, Metzner K, Kouyos R, Raffi F Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022; 9(6):ofac107.
PMID: 35615294 PMC: 9125303. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac107.
Two-Drug Regimens for HIV-Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges.
Perez-Gonzalez A, Suarez-Garcia I, Ocampo A, Poveda E Microorganisms. 2022; 10(2).
PMID: 35208887 PMC: 8880461. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10020433.