» Articles » PMID: 28092756

Effects of Assisted Outpatient Treatment and Health Care Services on Psychotic Symptoms

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2017 Jan 17
PMID 28092756
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: An ongoing debate concerns acceptability, benefits, and shortcomings of coercive treatment such as assisted outpatient treatment (AOT). The hypothesis that involuntary commitment to outpatient treatment may lead to a better clinical outcome for a subgroup of persons with severe mental illness (SMI) is controversial. Nonetheless, positive effects of AOT may be mediated by an increased availability of healthcare resources or increased service use.

Objective: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the course of delusions, hallucinations, and negative symptoms among patients with SMI receiving AOT compared to patients receiving non-compulsory treatment (NCT). Moreover, we assessed if the effects of AOT on psychotic symptoms were mediated by increased healthcare service use.

Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design to examine the effect of AOT and the use of healthcare services on psychotic symptoms. In total, 76 (41.3%) participants with SMI received AOT, and 108 (58.7%) received NCT. The participants were interviewed at baseline every 3 months up to 1 year. Propensity score matching was used to control for group differences.

Results: In the basic model, AOT was associated with lower severity of psychotic symptoms over all follow-up points. In the model including healthcare service use, the frequency of case manager visits predicted a reduction in severity of all psychotic symptoms. The frequency of visits to the outpatient clinics, frequency of emergency room, and psychiatrist visits were independently associated with lower levels of delusional symptoms. Psychiatrist visits were related to a decrease in negative symptoms.

Conclusion: Results indicate that the treatment benefits of AOT are enhanced with the increased use of mental healthcare services, suggesting that the positive effect of AOT on psychotic symptoms is related to the availability of mental healthcare service use. Coercive outpatient treatment might be more effective through greater use of intensive services.

Citing Articles

Client Outreach in Los Angeles County's Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program: Strategies and Barriers to Engagement.

Starks S, Kelly E, Castillo E, Meldrum M, Bourgois P, Braslow J Res Soc Work Pract. 2022; 32(7):839-854.

PMID: 36081900 PMC: 9447859. DOI: 10.1177/1049731520949918.


Editorial: Compulsory Interventions in Psychiatry: An Overview on the Current Situation and Recommendations for Prevention and Adequate Use.

Huber C, Schneeberger A Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:622373.

PMID: 33364991 PMC: 7750427. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.622373.


Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Plahouras J, Mehta S, Buchman D, Foussias G, Daskalakis Z, Blumberger D Eur Psychiatry. 2020; 63(1):e39.

PMID: 32406364 PMC: 7355163. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.37.


Compulsory Admission to Psychiatric Wards-Who Is Admitted, and Who Appeals Against Admission?.

Arnold B, Moeller J, Hochstrasser L, Schneeberger A, Borgwardt S, Lang U Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:544.

PMID: 31447710 PMC: 6695555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00544.


Commentary: The Implementation of China's Mental Health Law-Defined Risk Criteria for Involuntary Admission: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Involuntarily Hospitalized Patients.

Ma H, Shao Y Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:121.

PMID: 30914981 PMC: 6422891. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00121.