» Articles » PMID: 28088221

Role of Pelvic and Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in Abandoned Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) occupies fourth place in cancer incidence and mortality worldwide in women, with 560,505 new cases and 284,923 deaths per year. Approximately, nine of every ten (87%) take place in developing countries. When a macroscopic nodal involvement is discovered during a radical hysterectomy (RH), there is controversy in the literature between resect macroscopic lymph node compromise or abandonment of the surgery and sending the patient for standard chemo-radiotherapy treatment. The objective of this study is to compare the prognosis of patients with CC whom RH was abandoned and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed with that of patients who were only biopsied or with removal of a suspicious lymph node, treated with concomitant radiotherapy/chemotherapy in the standard manner.

Methods: A descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in two institutions from Mexico and Colombia. Clinical records of patients with early-stage CC programmed for RH with an intraoperative finding of pelvic lymph, para-aortic nodes, or any extracervical involvement that contraindicates the continuation of surgery were obtained. Between January 2007 and December 2012, 42 clinical patients complied with study inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis.

Results: In patients with CC whom RH was abandoned due to lymph node affectation, there is no difference in overall survival or in disease-free period between systematic lymphadenectomy and tumor removal or lymph node biopsy, in pelvic lymph nodes as well as in para-aortic lymph nodes, when these patients receive adjuvant treatment with concomitant radiotherapy/chemotherapy.

Conclusions: This is a hypothesis-generator study; thus, the recommendation is made to conduct randomized prospective studies to procure better knowledge on the impact of bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on this group of patients.

Citing Articles

Effect of different treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with stage IIIC cervical cancer.

Su X, Huang J, Wang N Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1405778.

PMID: 38863632 PMC: 11165038. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1405778.


Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Wang M, Ma M, Yang L, Liang C Front Oncol. 2022; 12:952347.

PMID: 36119526 PMC: 9479219. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.952347.


LncRNA MALAT1 Accelerates Cervical Carcinoma Proliferation by Suppressing miR-124 Expression in Cervical Tumor Cells.

Liang T, Wang Y, Jiao Y, Cong S, Jiang X, Dong L J Oncol. 2021; 2021:8836078.

PMID: 34221014 PMC: 8221887. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8836078.


Present status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cervical cancer.

Glickman A, Valdes S, Gil-Ibanez B, Paredes P, Cortes K, Torne Blade A Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018; 23(6):495-502.

PMID: 30534012 PMC: 6277279. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.04.004.


Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma.

Dai Y, Xu M, Zhong L, Xie X, Liu Z, Yan M J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(10):4082-4091.

PMID: 29963935 PMC: 6166324. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518785827.

References
1.
Suprasert P, Srisomboon J, Charoenkwan K, Siriaungul S, Khunamornpong S, Siriaree S . Outcomes of abandoned radical hysterectomy in patients with stages IB-IIA cervical cancer found to have positive nodes during the operation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15(3):498-502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.15315.x. View

2.
Gray H, Seifert E, Sal Y Rosas V, Nicandri K, Koh W, Goff B . The abandoned radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: clinical predictors and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010; 2010:743794. PMC: 2861195. DOI: 10.1155/2010/743794. View

3.
Lee Y, Wang K, Lin M, Liu C, Wang K, Lan C . Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for treatment of cervical cancer: a clinical review of 954 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1989; 32(2):135-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(89)80024-1. View

4.
Lai C, Huang K, Hong J, Lee C, Chou H, Chang T . Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89(1):160-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00064-7. View

5.
Chantalat E, Vidal F, Leguevaque P, Lepage B, Lambaudie E, Hebert T . Para-aortic workup in locally advanced cervical cancer: heterogeneity is still the rule. Results from a retrospective multicenter study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 293(5):1081-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3885-9. View