» Articles » PMID: 28085213

Transarterial Chemoembolization Prior to Liver Transplantation for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Jan 14
PMID 28085213
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: A debate exists over whether using preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Numerous studies have been investigating on this, but there is still no unanimous conclusion about the effect of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization. We conducted the meta-analysis of all available studies to systematically evaluate the influence of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization on liver transplant.

Methods: A systematic search was performed by two authors (Si TF. and Guan RY.) through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Science Citation Index Expanded, combined with Manual Retrieval and Cited Reference Search. The searching cut-off date was 2016/07/31, and all the data obtained were statistically analyzed using Review Manager version 5.1 software (Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011) recommended by Cochrane Collaboration.

Results: The study showed that there was no difference between the experimental group and the control group on perioperative mortality (RR = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.49-2.48], P = 0.82) or biliary complications (RR = 0.96, 95%CI = [0.66-1.39], P = 0.83). Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization had no obvious effect on improving overall survival (HR = 1.05, 95%CI = [0.65-1.72], P = 0. 83) but would result in a higher rate of vascular complications (RR = 2.01, 95%CI = [1.23-3.27], P = 0.005) and a reduction of disease free survival (HR = 1.66, 95%CI = [1.02-2.70], P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis also revealed that patients from transarterial chemoembolization group in Asia had a much lower overall survival rate (HR = 2.65, 95%CI = [1.49-4.71], P = 0.0009) compared with the control group.

Conclusions: Considering the possible adverse impacts on liver transplantation and the variation in sensitivity to transarterial chemoembolization, clinicians should be more cautious when considering transarterial chemoembolization as the bridging therapy for patients in the waiting list.

Citing Articles

Optimal candidates and surrogate endpoints for HAIC versus Sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Si T, Shao Q, Jassem W, Ma Y, Heaton N Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):1203-1213.

PMID: 39093862 PMC: 11745638. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001889.


Should Hypervascular Incidentalomas Detected on Per-Interventional Cone Beam Computed Tomography during Intra-Arterial Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Impact the Treatment Plan in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation?.

Derbel H, Galletto Pregliasco A, Mule S, Calderaro J, Zaarour Y, Saccenti L Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001395 PMC: 11240509. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132333.


2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

J Liver Cancer. 2023; 23(1):1-120.

PMID: 37384024 PMC: 10202234. DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07.


SMYD2 Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression by Reprogramming Glutamine Metabolism via c-Myc/GLS1 Axis.

Xu K, Ding J, Zhou L, Li D, Luo J, Wang W Cells. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36611819 PMC: 9818721. DOI: 10.3390/cells12010025.


2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Korean J Radiol. 2022; 23(12):1126-1240.

PMID: 36447411 PMC: 9747269. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822.