» Articles » PMID: 28082373

Nutrition Labelling is a Trade Policy Issue: Lessons from an Analysis of Specific Trade Concerns at the World Trade Organization

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Jan 14
PMID 28082373
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interpretive nutrition labels provide simplified nutrient-specific text and/or symbols on the front of pre-packaged foods, to encourage and enable consumers to make healthier choices. This type of labelling has been proposed as part of a comprehensive policy response to the global epidemic of non-communicable diseases. However, regulation of nutrition labelling falls under the remit of not just the health sector but also trade. Specific Trade Concerns have been raised at the World Trade Organization's Technical Barriers to Trade Committee regarding interpretive nutrition labelling initiatives in Thailand, Chile, Indonesia, Peru and Ecuador. This paper presents an analysis of the discussions of these concerns. Although nutrition labelling was identified as a legitimate policy objective, queries were raised regarding the justification of the specific labelling measures proposed, and the scientific evidence for effectiveness of such measures. Concerns were also raised regarding the consistency of the measures with international standards. Drawing on policy learning theory, we identified four lessons for public health policy makers, including: strategic framing of nutrition labelling policy objectives; pro-active policy engagement between trade and health to identify potential trade issues; identifying ways to minimize potential 'practical' trade concerns; and engagement with the Codex Alimentarius Commission to develop international guidance on interpretative labelling. This analysis indicates that while there is potential for trade sector concerns to stifle innovation in nutrition labelling policy, care in how interpretive nutrition labelling measures are crafted in light of trade commitments can minimize such a risk and help ensure that trade policy is coherent with nutrition action.

Citing Articles

Voluntary versus mandatory food labels, Australia.

Jones A, Maganja D, Shahid M, Neal B, Pettigrew S Bull World Health Organ. 2024; 102(10):691-698.

PMID: 39318891 PMC: 11418841. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.24.291629.


Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy.

Townsend B, Tenni B, Goldman S, Gleeson D Global Health. 2023; 19(1):60.

PMID: 37612767 PMC: 10463651. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00960-7.


Implementing front-of-pack nutrition warning labels in Mexico: important lessons for low- and middle-income countries.

Crosbie E, Otero Alvarez M, Cao M, Vejar Renteria L, Rodriguez E, Larranaga Flota A Public Health Nutr. 2023; 26(10):2149-2161.

PMID: 37519233 PMC: 10564596. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023001441.


Non-communicable disease policy implementation in Libya: A mixed methods assessment.

Allen L, Wild C, Loffreda G, Kak M, Aghilla M, Emahbes T PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(11):e0000615.

PMID: 36962549 PMC: 10021530. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000615.


Framing policy objectives in the sustainable development goals: hierarchy, balance, or transformation?.

Lencucha R, Kulenova A, Thow A Global Health. 2023; 19(1):5.

PMID: 36691068 PMC: 9869817. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00909-w.