» Articles » PMID: 28074571

Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Implementation Barriers, Facilitators and Model Migration

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Jan 12
PMID 28074571
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To identify barriers and facilitators associated with initial implementation of a US alcohol and other substance use Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) grant program, and to identify modifications in program design that addressed implementation challenges.

Design: A mixed-method approach used quantitative and qualitative data, including SBIRT provider ratings of implementation barriers and facilitators, staff interview responses and program documentation.

Setting: Multiple sites within the first seven programs funded in a national demonstration program in the United States.

Participants: One hundred and two SBIRT providers were surveyed; 221 SBIRT stakeholders and staff were interviewed.

Measurements: Mean ratings of barriers and facilitators were calculated using provider survey responses. An inductive content analysis of interview responses identified factors perceived to support and challenge implementation; program modifications that occurred over time were recorded.

Findings: Providers rated pre-selected implementation facilitators higher than barriers. Content analysis of interview responses revealed six themes: committed leaders; intra- and inter-organizational communication/collaboration; provider buy-in and model acceptance; contextual factors; quality assurance; and grant requirements. Over time, programs tended to: adopt more efficient 'pre-screen' item sets; screen for risk factors in addition to alcohol/substance use; use contracted specialists to deliver SBIRT services; conduct services in high-volume emergency department and trauma center settings; and implement on-site and telephonic treatment delivery.

Conclusions: Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment program implementation in the United States is facilitated by committed leadership and the use of substance use specialists, rather than medical generalists, to deliver services. Many implementation challenges can be addressed by an adequate start-up phase focused on comprehensive education and training, and on the development of intra- and inter-organizational communication and collaboration; opinion leader support; and practitioner and host site buy-in.

Citing Articles

Contextual factors associated with successful alcohol screening and brief intervention implementation and sustainment in adult primary care.

Sterling S, Lu Y, Grijalva C, Ross T, Weisner C, Elson J J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024; 168:209532.

PMID: 39384094 PMC: 11624056. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209532.


Between acute medicine and municipal alcohol treatment: Cross-sectoral collaborations regarding patients with alcohol problems.

Sivertsen D, Becker U, Andersen O, Kirk J Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2024; 41(4):403-425.

PMID: 39309201 PMC: 11412477. DOI: 10.1177/14550725241252256.


Exploring barriers and facilitators to addressing hazardous alcohol use and AUD in mental health services: a qualitative study among Dutch professionals.

Kools N, Rozema A, van den Bulck F, Bovens R, Mathijssen J, van de Mheen D Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):65.

PMID: 39252050 PMC: 11385808. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00497-z.


Cross-Site Evaluation of Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Implementation Programs in Healthcare Systems Serving Individuals of Reproductive Age.

Vendetti J, Bangham C, Riba M, Whitmore C, Steinberg Gallucci K, Hanson B Subst Use Addctn J. 2024; 46(2):461-475.

PMID: 39138912 PMC: 11823082. DOI: 10.1177/29767342241267074.


A Qualitative Investigation of Characteristics Impacting Clinical Decision-Making in Integrated Behavioral Health Care.

Smith A, Prom M, Ng L J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024; 51(4):561-587.

PMID: 38982024 PMC: 11445319. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-024-09891-6.