» Articles » PMID: 28074178

Effects of Frequency and Acceleration Amplitude on Osteoblast Mechanical Vibration Responses: A Finite Element Study

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Jan 12
PMID 28074178
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone cells are deformed according to mechanical stimulation they receive and their mechanical characteristics. However, how osteoblasts are affected by mechanical vibration frequency and acceleration amplitude remains unclear. By developing 3D osteoblast finite element (FE) models, this study investigated the effect of cell shapes on vibration characteristics and effect of acceleration (vibration intensity) on vibrational responses of cultured osteoblasts. Firstly, the developed FE models predicted natural frequencies of osteoblasts within 6.85-48.69 Hz. Then, three different levels of acceleration of base excitation were selected (0.5, 1, and 2 g) to simulate vibrational responses, and acceleration of base excitation was found to have no influence on natural frequencies of osteoblasts. However, vibration response values of displacement, stress, and strain increased with the increase of acceleration. Finally, stress and stress distributions of osteoblast models under 0.5 g acceleration in -direction were investigated further. It was revealed that resonance frequencies can be a monotonic function of cell height or bottom area when cell volumes and material properties were assumed as constants. These findings will be useful in understanding how forces are transferred and influence osteoblast mechanical responses during vibrations and in providing guidance for cell culture and external vibration loading in experimental and clinical osteogenesis studies.

Citing Articles

Design, Implementation, and Validation of a Piezoelectric Device to Study the Effects of Dynamic Mechanical Stimulation on Cell Proliferation, Migration and Morphology.

Mojena-Medina D, Martinez-Hernandez M, de la Fuente M, Garcia-Isla G, Posada J, Jorcano J Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(7).

PMID: 32290334 PMC: 7180771. DOI: 10.3390/s20072155.


[Early stage mechanical adaptability and osteogenic differentiation of mouse bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell under micro-vibration stimulation environment].

Wu J, Wu Y, Chen X, Zhi W Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2020; 37(1):96-104.

PMID: 32096382 PMC: 9927673. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.201903056.


Finite Element Modelling of Single Cell Based on Atomic Force Microscope Indentation Method.

Wang L, Wang L, Xu L, Chen W Comput Math Methods Med. 2020; 2019:7895061.

PMID: 31933677 PMC: 6942797. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7895061.


Effect of mechanical vibration stress in cell culture on human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Kanie K, Sakai T, Imai Y, Yoshida K, Sugimoto A, Makino H Regen Ther. 2020; 12:27-35.

PMID: 31890764 PMC: 6933472. DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2019.05.002.


Response of membrane tension to gravity in an approximate cell model.

Wang L, Chen W, Guo H, Qian A Theor Biol Med Model. 2019; 16(1):19.

PMID: 31801614 PMC: 6894217. DOI: 10.1186/s12976-019-0116-2.


References
1.
Evans E . New membrane concept applied to the analysis of fluid shear- and micropipette-deformed red blood cells. Biophys J. 1973; 13(9):941-54. PMC: 1484376. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86036-9. View

2.
McGarry J, Klein-Nulend J, Mullender M, Prendergast P . A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses--a computational and experimental study. FASEB J. 2004; 19(3):482-4. DOI: 10.1096/fj.04-2210fje. View

3.
Uzer G, Pongkitwitoon S, Ian C, Thompson W, Rubin J, Chan M . Gap junctional communication in osteocytes is amplified by low intensity vibrations in vitro. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90840. PMC: 3948700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090840. View

4.
Fan H, Li S . Modeling universal dynamics of cell spreading on elastic substrates. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2015; 14(6):1265-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-015-0673-1. View

5.
Marcus R . Exercise: moving in the right direction. J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13(12):1793-6. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1793. View