» Articles » PMID: 28067763

An Online Survey on Consumer Knowledge and Understanding of Added Sugars

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2017 Jan 10
PMID 28067763
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence of an association between added sugars (AS) and the risk of obesity has triggered public health bodies to develop strategies enabling consumers to manage their AS intake. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has strongly recommended a reduction of free sugars to 10% of total dietary energy (TE) and conditionally recommended a reduction to 5% TE to achieve health benefits. Despite food labelling being a policy tool of choice in many countries, there is no consensus on the mandatory addition of AS to the nutrition panel of food labels. An online survey was conducted to explore consumer ability to identify AS on food labels and to investigate consumer awareness of the WHO guidelines in relation to sugar intakes. The questionnaire was tested for participant comprehension using face-to-face interviews prior to conducting the online study. The online survey was conducted in Northern Ireland during May 2015 and was completed by a convenient sample of 445 subjects. Results showed that just 4% of respondents correctly classified 10 or more ingredients from a presented list of 13 items, while 65% of participants were unaware of the WHO guidelines for sugar intake. It may be timely to reopen dialogue on inclusion of AS on food product nutrition panels.

Citing Articles

Factors influencing the maternal choice of packaged snacks for 6-10 years old children: A cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka.

Pujitha Gunawardhana D, Talagala I PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(9):e0003574.

PMID: 39231198 PMC: 11373799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003574.


Self -reported knowledge and understanding of added sugars by consumers in Ghana.

Adjei R, Sarfo Boateng A, Owusu-Kwarteng J Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31243.

PMID: 38803890 PMC: 11128992. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31243.


Understanding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Concerning Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Beverage Taxation among Saudi University Students.

Alothmani N, Almoraie N Nutrients. 2023; 15(19).

PMID: 37836435 PMC: 10574237. DOI: 10.3390/nu15194151.


Knowledge and Practices of Cypriot Bovine Farmers towards Effective and Safe Manure Management.

Christophe S, Pentieva K, Botsaris G Vet Sci. 2023; 10(4).

PMID: 37104447 PMC: 10146322. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10040293.


Regional Differences in Added Sweetener Knowledge, Consumption and Body Mass Index in People with HIV in the United States.

Kileel E, Dickins K, Blossom J, Looby S, Fitch K AIDS Behav. 2022; 27(3):816-822.

PMID: 36094637 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03814-2.


References
1.
Logue C, Dowey L, Strain J, Verhagen H, Gallagher A . The potential application of a biomarker approach for the investigation of low-calorie sweetener exposure. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; 75(2):216-25. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665115004310. View

2.
Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D . Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(7):855-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x. View

3.
Grunert K, Fernandez-Celemin L, Wills J, Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann S, Nureeva L . Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2010; 18(3):261-277. PMC: 2967247. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0. View

4.
Wills J, Schmidt D, Pillo-Blocka F, Cairns G . Exploring global consumer attitudes toward nutrition information on food labels. Nutr Rev. 2009; 67 Suppl 1:S102-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00170.x. View

5.
Kyle T, Thomas D . Consumers believe nutrition facts labeling for added sugar will be more helpful than confusing. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014; 22(12):2481-4. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20887. View