» Articles » PMID: 28066834

The Role of Ventilation Mode Using a Laryngeal Mask Airway During Gynecological Laparoscopy on Lung Mechanics, Hemodynamic Response and Blood Gas Analysis

Overview
Date 2017 Jan 10
PMID 28066834
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are two methods for ventilation in gynecological laparoscopy: volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).

Objective: To compare the lung mechanics, hemodynamic response and arterial blood gas analysis and gas exchange of two modes of VCV and PCV using laryngeal mask airway (LMA) at different time intervals.

Materials And Methods: Sixty infertile women referred for diagnostic laparoscopy, based on ventilation mode, were randomly divided into two groups of VCV (tidal volume: 10 ml/kg) and PCV. In the PCV group, ventilation was initiated with a peak airway pressure (tidal volume: 10 ml/kg, upper limit: 35 cm HO). In both groups, the arterial blood samples were taken in several time intervals (5, 10 and 15 min after LMA insertion) for blood gas evaluation. Also the lung mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and were recorded at different time intervals.

Results: There were no significant differences for patient's age, weight, height and BMI in two groups. The peak and plateau airway pressure were significantly higher in VCV group compared to PCV group 5 and 10 min after insertion of LMA. PaO was significantly higher after 10 and 15 min in VCV group compared to PCV group (p=0.005 and p=0.03, respectively). PaCO showed significant increase after 5 min in PCV group, but the differences were not significant after 10 and 15 min in two groups. The end tidal CO showed significant increase after 10 and 15 min in VCV compared to PCV group.

Conclusion: Both VCV and PCV seem to be suitable for gynecological laparoscopy. However, airway pressures are significantly lower in PCV compared to VCV.

References
1.
Brain A, McGhee T, McAteer E, Thomas A, Bushman J . The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway. Anaesthesia. 1985; 40(4):356-61. View

2.
Balick-Weber C, Nicolas P, Hedreville-Montout M, Blanchet P, Stephan F . Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: a cross-over study with echocardiographic assessment. Br J Anaesth. 2007; 99(3):429-35. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem166. View

3.
Esteban A, Alia I, Gordo F, de Pablo R, Suarez J, Gonzalez G . Prospective randomized trial comparing pressure-controlled ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation in ARDS. For the Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group. Chest. 2000; 117(6):1690-6. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.6.1690. View

4.
Maltby J, Beriault M, Watson N, Fick G . Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth. 2000; 47(7):622-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03018993. View

5.
Galvin E, van Doorn M, Blazquez J, Ubben J, Zijlstra F, Klein J . A randomized prospective study comparing the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Classic during controlled ventilation for gynecological laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2006; 104(1):102-5. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246812.21391.d1. View