» Articles » PMID: 28059712

Fetal Brain Anomalies Associated with Ventriculomegaly or Asymmetry: An MRI-Based Study

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jan 7
PMID 28059712
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Fetal lateral ventriculomegaly is a relatively common finding with much debate over its clinical significance. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between ventriculomegaly and asymmetry and concomitant CNS findings as seen in fetal brain MR imaging.

Materials And Methods: Fetal brain MR imaging performed for various indications, including ventriculomegaly, with or without additional ultrasound findings, was assessed for possible inclusion. Two hundred seventy-eight cases found to have at least 1 lateral ventricle with a width of ≥10 mm were included in the study. Ventriculomegaly was considered mild if the measurement was 10-11.9 mm; moderate if, 12-14.9 mm; and severe if, ≥15 mm. Asymmetry was defined as a difference of ≥2 mm between the 2 lateral ventricles. Fetal brain MR imaging findings were classified according to severity by predefined categories.

Results: The risk of CNS findings appears to be strongly related to the width of the ventricle (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.08-1.76; = .009). The prevalence of associated CNS abnormalities was significantly higher ( = .005) in symmetric ventriculomegaly compared with asymmetric ventriculomegaly (38.8% versus 24.2%, respectively, for all CNS abnormalities and 20% versus 7.1%, respectively, for major CNS abnormalities).

Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrate that the rate of minor and major findings increased with each millimeter increase in ventricle width and that the presence of symmetric ventricles in mild and moderate ventriculomegaly was a prognostic indicator for CNS abnormalities.

Citing Articles

Clinical characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetuses with ventriculomegaly.

Alici Davutoglu E, Arica G, Sahin N, Kalyoncu Ucar A, Adaletli I, Vural Z Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(4):2065-2071.

PMID: 38926203 PMC: 11393207. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07599-8.


Volume development changes in the occipital lobe gyrus assessed by MRI in fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly correlate with neurological development in infancy and early childhood.

Zhang X, Chen Z, Li Y, Xie C, Liu Z, Wu Q J Perinatol. 2024; 44(8):1178-1185.

PMID: 38802655 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02012-3.


MR insights into fetal brain development: what is normal and what is not.

Cortes-Albornoz M, Bedoya M, Choi J, Jaimes C Pediatr Radiol. 2024; 54(4):635-645.

PMID: 38416183 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-05890-z.


Fetal neurosurgery.

Cavalheiro S, da Costa M, Barbosa M, Capraro Suriano I, Ottaiano A, Freddi T Childs Nerv Syst. 2023; 39(10):2899-2927.

PMID: 37606832 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06109-6.


Hippocampal rotation is associated with ventricular atrial size.

Whitehead M, Limperopoulos C, Schlatterer S, Mulkey S, Fraser J, du Plessis A Pediatr Radiol. 2023; 53(9):1941-1950.

PMID: 37183230 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05687-6.


References
1.
Salomon L, Ouahba J, Delezoide A, Vuillard E, Oury J, Sebag G . Third-trimester fetal MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it?. BJOG. 2006; 113(8):942-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01003.x. View

2.
Vasudevan C, McKechnie L, Levene M . Long-term outcome of antenatally diagnosed agenesis of corpus callosum and cerebellar malformations. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 17(5):295-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2012.07.001. View

3.
Salomon L, Bernard J, Ville Y . Reference ranges for fetal ventricular width: a non-normal approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30(1):61-6. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4026. View

4.
Weichert J, Hartge D, Krapp M, Germer U, Gembruch U, Axt-Fliedner R . Prevalence, characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly in 29,000 pregnancies followed at a single institution. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27(3):142-8. DOI: 10.1159/000304735. View

5.
Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T . The fetal cerebellum. Pitfalls in diagnosis and management. Prenat Diagn. 2009; 29(4):372-80. DOI: 10.1002/pd.2196. View