» Articles » PMID: 28057066

Evaluations of Dual Attractant Toxic Sugar Baits for Surveillance and Control of Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus in Florida

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Jan 7
PMID 28057066
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dual attractant toxic sugar baits (D-ATSB) containing two host kairomones, L-lactic (LA) and 1-octen-3-ol (O), and fruit-based attractants were evaluated through olfactory, consumption and mortality, and semi-field experiments to determine if host kairomones could first, enhance attraction of a fruit-based (attractant) toxic sugar bait (ATSB), and second, increase the efficacy of a fruit based attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB).

Methods: Four combinations of LA and O were incorporated into the ATSB and evaluated in an olfactometer to determine if these combinations could enhance attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.) to the bait. Ae. albopictus (Skuse) and Ae. aegypti were used to determine bait consumption through excrement droplet counts and percent mortality, of the most attractive D-ATSB (1% LA and 1% O) from the olfactory study. Semi-field evaluations were conducted in screened portable field cages to determine if the D-ATSB applied to non-flowering plants controlled more mosquitoes than the fruit-based ATSB, and ASB. Mosquitoes were exposed to D-ATSB and the two controls for 48 h and collected with BGS traps. The catch rates of the BGS traps were compared to determine efficacy of the D-ATSB.

Results: During olfactometer evaluations of D-ATSB, Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were more attracted to 1% LA and 1% O compared to the fruit-based toxic sugar bait alone. Both species of mosquito consumed more fruit-based non-toxic bait (ASB) and ATSB than the D-ATSB. For both species, percent mortality bioassays indicated D-ATSB controlled mosquitoes, as compared to non-toxic control, but not more than the fruit based ATSB. Semi-field evaluations, BioGents sentinel traps at 48 h confirmed that ATSB (positive control) controlled Ae. albopictus, but there was no statistical difference between ASB (negative control) and the D-ATSB. No differences were observed between the mosquitoes caught in any of the experimental formulations for Ae. aegypti.

Conclusions: L-lactic (1%) and 1-octen-3-ol (1%) added to a fruit-based sugar bait increased attraction of Ae. aegypti and may have future implications in mosquito trapping devices. The addition of the host kairomones did not enhance the consumption and efficacy of the ATSB in laboratory or semi-field evaluations for both mosquito species. We attribute to the absence of other host cues leading to lack of alighting onto bait surfaces to imbibe the toxic bait, as well as a possible decrease in palatability of the bait caused by the addition of the host kairomones.

Citing Articles

Sugar feeding by Aedes albopictus in the Torres Strait, Australia.

Sebayang B, Russell T, Mosby S, Gela R, Roeger D, van de Straat B PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025; 19(2):e0012856.

PMID: 39919105 PMC: 11819548. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012856.


Emerging public health strategies in malaria control: innovations and implications.

Obeagu E, Obeagu G Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(11):6576-6584.

PMID: 39525724 PMC: 11543165. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002578.


Diuresis and α-glucosidase inhibition by erythritol in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and viability for efficacy against mosquitoes.

Nelson I, Baker K, Faraji A, White G, Bibbs C Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):76.

PMID: 38378683 PMC: 10880232. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06169-w.


Maximizing the Potential of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSBs) for Integrated Vector Management.

Njoroge T, Hamid-Adiamoh M, Duman-Scheel M Insects. 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37504591 PMC: 10380652. DOI: 10.3390/insects14070585.


Biology and Behaviour of in the Human Environment: Opportunities for Vector Control of Arbovirus Transmission.

Facchinelli L, Badolo A, McCall P Viruses. 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36992346 PMC: 10053764. DOI: 10.3390/v15030636.


References
1.
Becker N, Zgomba M, Petric D, Ludwig M . Comparison of carbon dioxide, octenol and a host-odour as mosquito attractants in the Upper Rhine Valley, Germany. Med Vet Entomol. 1995; 9(4):377-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1995.tb00008.x. View

2.
Smith C, Smith N, GOUCK H, WEIDHAAS D, GILBERT I, Mayer M . L-lactic acid as a factor in the attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to human hosts. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1970; 63(3):760-70. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/63.3.760. View

3.
Bowen M . The sensory physiology of host-seeking behavior in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991; 36:139-58. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.001035. View

4.
Bernier U, Kline D, Posey K, Booth M, Yost R, Barnard D . Synergistic attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.) to binary blends of L-lactic acid and acetone, dichloromethane, or dimethyl disulfide. J Med Entomol. 2003; 40(5):653-6. DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-40.5.653. View

5.
Foster W, Hancock R . Nectar-related olfactory and visual attractants for mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994; 10(2 Pt 2):288-96. View