» Articles » PMID: 28053785

Complications, Not Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique, Are Associated with Increased Cost After Esophagectomy

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Jan 6
PMID 28053785
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) techniques offer similar oncological and surgical outcomes to open methods. The effects of MIE on hospital costs are not well documented. . We reviewed the electronic records of patients who underwent esophagectomy at a single academic institution between January 2012 and December 2014. Esophagectomy techniques were grouped into open, hybrid, MIE, and transhiatal (THE) esophagectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of surgery on total hospital cost after esophagectomy. . 80 patients were identified: 11 THE, 11 open, 41 hybrid, and 17 MIE. Median total cost of the hospitalization was $31,375 and was similar between surgical technique groups. MIE was associated with higher intraoperative costs, but not total hospital cost. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of a complication, increased age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (ASA4), and preoperative coronary artery disease (CAD) were associated with significantly increased cost. . Despite the association of MIE with higher operation costs, the total hospital cost was not different between surgical technique groups. Postoperative complications and severe preoperative comorbidities are significant drivers of hospital cost associated with esophagectomy. Surgeons should choose technique based on clinical factors, rather than cost implications.

Citing Articles

Performance of a deep learning-based identification system for esophageal cancer from CT images.

Takeuchi M, Seto T, Hashimoto M, Ichihara N, Morimoto Y, Kawakubo H Esophagus. 2021; 18(3):612-620.

PMID: 33635412 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-021-00826-0.


Factors associated with the costs of hospitalization after esophagectomy: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary cancer hospital in China.

Liu Q, Yu Y, Wang D, Xing W J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(10):5970-5979.

PMID: 33209429 PMC: 7656344. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2770.


Preoperative exercise to improve fitness in patients undergoing complex surgery for cancer of the lung or oesophagus (PRE-HIIT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Sheill G, Guinan E, ONeill L, Normand C, Doyle S, Moore S BMC Cancer. 2020; 20(1):321.

PMID: 32293334 PMC: 7160913. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06795-4.


Imaging findings of complications after thoracic surgery.

Kang Y, Kim J, Cha Y, Jeong Y Jpn J Radiol. 2019; 37(3):209-219.

PMID: 30637569 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-00806-y.


The Cost of Complications Following Major Resection of Malignant Neoplasia.

Zogg C, Ottesen T, Kebaish K, Galivanche A, Murthy S, Changoor N J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22(11):1976-1986.

PMID: 29946953 PMC: 6224301. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3850-6.


References
1.
Biere S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Maas K, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia J . Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379(9829):1887-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. View

2.
Lee L, Sudarshan M, Li C, Latimer E, Fried G, Mulder D . Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(12):3732-9. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3103-6. View

3.
Paul S, Altorki N . Outcomes in the management of esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110(5):599-610. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23759. View

4.
Tiwari M, Reynoso J, High R, Tsang A, Oleynikov D . Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2010; 25(4):1127-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z. View

5.
Bailey L, Khan O, Willows E, Somers S, Mercer S, Toh S . Open and laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy: a prospective comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 43(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs314. View