» Articles » PMID: 28053546

Comparing Efficacy and Survivals of Initial Treatments for Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jan 6
PMID 28053546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcome of initial therapies for elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained through a comprehensive search. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the interested outcome measures. Network meta-analysis (NMA) using graph theory methodology to construct an NMA model, and sensitivity analysis were performed.

Results: Nineteen RCTs containing 7,235 participants and 17 treatments were included in the NMA. As compared to the classic melphalan plus prednisone (MP) regimen, the majority of other initial regimens showed higher rates of complete response/near complete response, overall response rate (ORR) and better PFS as well as OS. These four outcomes favored the two lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimens (continuous lenalidomide and 18 cycles of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone), especially continuous lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen, over the majority of other regimens including the two established standard treatments (MP plus thalidomide or bortezomib) for elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM.

Conclusion: Continuous lenalidomide plus dexamethasone ranked as the best regimen in terms of ORR and OS for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM.

Citing Articles

Multiple drug combinations of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and thalidomide for first-line treatment in adults with transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis.

Piechotta V, Jakob T, Langer P, Monsef I, Scheid C, Estcourt L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2019(11).

PMID: 31765002 PMC: 6876545. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013487.


Development and Validation of a 9-Gene Prognostic Signature in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Liu X, Yin X, Meng X, Yan X, Wang F, He L Front Oncol. 2019; 8:615.

PMID: 30671382 PMC: 6331463. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00615.


The Expression of Actin-Related Protein 2/3 Complex Subunit 5 (ARPC5) Expression in Multiple Myeloma and its Prognostic Significance.

Xiong T, Luo Z Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:6340-6348.

PMID: 30201948 PMC: 6144731. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908944.


Maintenance Treatment and Survival in Patients With Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Gay F, Jackson G, Rosinol L, Holstein S, Moreau P, Spada S JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(10):1389-1397.

PMID: 30098165 PMC: 6233774. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2961.

References
1.
Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, Ammerlaan R, Wittebol S, Sinnige H . Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(19):3160-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.1610. View

2.
Tierney J, Stewart L, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes M . Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007; 8:16. PMC: 1920534. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16. View

3.
Mateos M, Oriol A, Martinez-Lopez J, Teruel A, Lopez de la Guia A, Lopez J . GEM2005 trial update comparing VMP/VTP as induction in elderly multiple myeloma patients: do we still need alkylators?. Blood. 2014; 124(12):1887-93. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-573733. View

4.
Magarotto V, Bringhen S, Offidani M, Benevolo G, Patriarca F, Mina R . Triplet vs doublet lenalidomide-containing regimens for the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016; 127(9):1102-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662627. View

5.
Zweegman S, van der Holt B, Mellqvist U, Salomo M, Bos G, Levin M . Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide versus melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in untreated multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016; 127(9):1109-16. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679415. View