» Articles » PMID: 28050868

[Field Assessment of the New Rapid Diagnostic Test Ebola EZYSCREEN®]

Overview
Date 2017 Jan 5
PMID 28050868
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa in 2014, the World Health Organization has pointed out the need for rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid, equipment-free, and deliverable. The rapid diagnostic test (Lateral Flow Assay) Ebola eZYSCREEN® was developed in this emergency frame using monoclonal antibodies against the envelope glycoprotein of the virus. Two distinct versions have been industrialized, one for whole-blood samples and the other for serum/plasma samples. Both versions have an analytical detection limit of 10 pfu/ml, the stability is at least 393 days at 30°C and 120 days at 45°C. The nonretrospective and independent validation study was carried out in the course of the outbreak in Conakry and at the Ebola Treatment Center of Coyah (Guinea) on 144 patients. In this study, the RDT showed a sensitivity of 65.3% and a specificity of 98.9% on whole blood, a sensitivity of 74.5% and a specificity of 100% on serum. Results from the whole-blood version must be analyzed with caution because of the delay between the blood collection and the completion of the tests, which was out of specification (3 days on average instead of 2 h). In contrast to laboratory tests, this easy to use field test does not require sophisticated instrumentation or even electricity and can contribute to the diagnostic chain of Ebola virus disease taking into account its benefits, high stability, and specificity but also its limit of sensitivity compared to laboratory techniques RT-qPCR (Real-Time reverse transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction), which remain the reference for the diagnosis of Ebola. The RDT Ebola eZYSCREEN® was granted EC IVD (IVD = In Vitro Diagnostic) marking.

Citing Articles

Diagnostics of Ebola virus.

Bettini A, Lapa D, Garbuglia A Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1123024.

PMID: 36908455 PMC: 9995846. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1123024.


Rapid diagnostic tests versus RT-PCR for Ebola virus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muzembo B, Kitahara K, Ohno A, Ntontolo N, Ngatu N, Okamoto K Bull World Health Organ. 2022; 100(7):447-458.

PMID: 35813519 PMC: 9243686. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.21.287496.


Treatment of Ebola-related critical illness.

Kiiza P, Mullin S, Teo K, Adhikari N, Fowler R Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(2):285-297.

PMID: 32055888 PMC: 7223059. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05949-z.