» Articles » PMID: 28050574

A Validation Study of a Novel 3-Dimensional MRI Modeling Technique to Identify the Anatomic Insertions of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Jan 5
PMID 28050574
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the current gold standard in ACL reconstructive surgery. However, placement of femoral and tibial tunnels at the anatomic center of the ACL insertion sites can be difficult intraoperatively. We developed a "virtual arthroscopy" program that allows users to identify ACL insertions on preoperative knee magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and generates a 3-dimensional (3D) bone model that matches the arthroscopic view to help guide intraoperative tunnel placement.

Purpose: To test the validity of the ACL insertion sites identified using our 3D modeling program and to determine the accuracy of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction guided by our "virtual arthroscopic" model.

Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: Sixteen cadaveric knees were prescanned using routine MRI sequences. A trained, blinded observer then identified the center of the ACL insertions using our program. Eight knees were dissected, and the centers of the ACL footprints were marked with a screw. In the remaining 8 knees, arthroscopic ACL tunnels were drilled into the center of the ACL footprints based on landmarks identified using our virtual arthroscopic model. Postprocedural MRI was performed on all 16 knees. The 3D distance between pre- and postoperative 3D centers of the ACL were calculated by 2 trained, blinded observers and a musculoskeletal radiologist.

Results: With 2 outliers removed, the postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel placements in the open specimens differed by 2.5 ± 0.9 mm and 2.9 ± 0.7 mm from preoperative centers identified on MRI. Postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel centers in the arthroscopic specimens differed by 3.2 ± 0.9 mm and 2.9 ± 0.7 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: Our results show that MRI-based 3D localization of the ACL and our virtual arthroscopic modeling program is feasible and does not show a statistically significant difference to an open arthrotomy approach. However, additional refinements will be required to improve the accuracy and consistency of our model to make this an effective tool for surgeons performing anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Clinical Relevance: Arthroscopic anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is the current gold standard for ACL reconstruction; however, the center of the ACL footprint can be difficult to identify arthroscopically. Our novel modeling can improve the identification of this important landmark intraoperatively and decrease the risk of graft malposition and subsequent graft failure.

Citing Articles

Reliability of Anatomic Bony Landmark Localization of the ACL Femoral Footprint Using 3D MRI.

Sivakumaran T, Jaffer R, Marwan Y, Hart A, Radu A, Burman M Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(10):23259671211042603.

PMID: 34692880 PMC: 8532227. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211042603.


In-vivo three-dimensional MR imaging of the intact anterior cruciate ligament shows a variable insertion pattern of the femoral and tibial footprints.

Scheffler S, Maschewski K, Becker R, Asbach P Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(12):3667-3672.

PMID: 29728742 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4939-x.

References
1.
Finsterbush A, Frankl U, Matan Y, Mann G . Secondary damage to the knee after isolated injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18(5):475-9. DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800505. View

2.
Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M, Suzuki D, Nagano A . Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(5):787-92. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505282625. View

3.
Fernandes T, Fregni F, Weaver K, Pedrinelli A, Camanho G, Hernandez A . The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 22(1):97-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2288-8. View

4.
Nakagawa T, Hiraoka H, Fukuda A, Kuribayashi S, Nakayama S, Matsubara T . Fluoroscopic-based navigation-assisted placement of the tibial tunnel in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(4):443.e1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.036. View

5.
Chalmers P, Mall N, Moric M, Sherman S, Paletta G, Cole B . Does ACL reconstruction alter natural history?: A systematic literature review of long-term outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(4):292-300. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01713. View