» Articles » PMID: 28048963

Effects of Condensation on Peri-implant Bone Density and Remodeling

Overview
Journal J Dent Res
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Jan 4
PMID 28048963
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone condensation is thought to densify interfacial bone and thus improve implant primary stability, but scant data substantiate either claim. We developed a murine oral implant model to test these hypotheses. Osteotomies were created in healed maxillary extraction sites 1) by drilling or 2) by drilling followed by stepwise condensation with tapered osteotomes. Condensation increased interfacial bone density, as measured by a significant change in bone volume/total volume and trabecular spacing, but it simultaneously damaged the bone. On postimplant day 1, the condensed bone interface exhibited microfractures and osteoclast activity. Finite element modeling, mechanical testing, and immunohistochemical analyses at multiple time points throughout the osseointegration period demonstrated that condensation caused very high interfacial strains, marginal bone resorption, and no improvement in implant stability. Collectively, these multiscale analyses demonstrate that condensation does not positively contribute to implant stability.

Citing Articles

Considering the Value of 3D Cultures for Enhancing the Understanding of Adhesion, Proliferation, and Osteogenesis on Titanium Dental Implants.

Ferro F, Azzolin F, Spelat R, Bevilacqua L, Maglione M Biomolecules. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37509084 PMC: 10377630. DOI: 10.3390/biom13071048.


Effects of Osseodensification on Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Conical Implants-An Ex Vivo Study.

Formiga M, da Silva H, Ghiraldini B, Siroma R, Ardelean L, Piattelli A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37297938 PMC: 10253638. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113736.


Influence of buccal and palatal bone thickness on post-surgical marginal bone changes around implants placed in posterior maxilla: a multi-centre prospective study.

Cicciu M, Pratella U, Fiorillo L, Bernardello F, Perillo F, Rapani A BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):309.

PMID: 37217911 PMC: 10204312. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02991-3.


Removal of a Horizontally Displaced Dental Implant below the Mandibular Canal.

Fakih K, Edreva M, Stoichkov B Case Rep Dent. 2023; 2023:6663874.

PMID: 37006703 PMC: 10065860. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6663874.


Comparison of insertion torque, implant stability quotient and removal torque, in two different implant designs with and without osseodensification. - An ex vivo bench top study.

Gandhi Y, Padhye N J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023; 13(2):249-252.

PMID: 36818026 PMC: 9930143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.004.


References
1.
Shayesteh Y, Khojasteh A, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Bassir S, Hossaini M . A comparative study of crestal bone loss and implant stability between osteotome and conventional implant insertion techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 15(3):350-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00376.x. View

2.
Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Troger M, Loos K . Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 13(6):595-602. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130604.x. View

3.
Monje A, Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F, Chan H, Galindo-Moreno P, Suarez F . Microarchitectural pattern of pristine maxillary bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 30(1):125-32. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3681. View

4.
Mouraret S, Hunter D, Bardet C, Popelut A, Brunski J, Chaussain C . Improving oral implant osseointegration in a murine model via Wnt signal amplification. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 41(2):172-80. PMC: 4993043. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12187. View

5.
Hahn J . Clinical uses of osteotomes. J Oral Implantol. 1999; 25(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0023:CUOO>2.3.CO;2. View