» Articles » PMID: 28033366

A Model Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Genotyping for CYP2D6 Among Older, Depressed Inpatients Starting Nortriptyline Pharmacotherapy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Dec 30
PMID 28033366
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Genotyping for CYP2D6 has the potential to predict differences in metabolism of nortriptyline. This information could optimize pharmacotherapy. We determined the costs and effects of routine genotyping for old aged Dutch depressed inpatients.

Methods: With a decision-tree, we modelled the first 12 weeks of nortriptyline therapy. Direct costs of genotyping, hospitalization, therapeutic drug monitoring and drugs were included. Based on genotype, patients could be correctly, sub-, or supratherapeutically dosed. Improvement from sub- or supratherapeutically dosed patients to correctly dosed patients was simulated, assuming that genotyping would prevent under- or overdosing of patients. In the base case, this improvement was assumed to be 35%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed to determine uncertainty around the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results: In the base case analysis, costs for genotyping were assumed €200 per test with a corresponding ICER at €1 333 000 per QALY. To reach a €50 000 per QALY cut-off, genotyping costs should be decreased towards €40 per test. At genotyping test costs < €35 per test, genotyping was dominant. At test costs of €17 per test there was a 95% probability that genotyping was cost-effective at €50 000 per QALY.

Conclusions: CYP2D6 genotyping was not cost-effective at current genotyping costs at a €50 000 per QALY threshold, however at test costs below €40, genotyping could be costs-effective.

Citing Articles

How is Value Defined in Molecular Testing in Cancer? A Scoping Review.

Minhinnick A, Santos-Gonzalez F, Wilson M, Lorgelly P Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024; .

PMID: 38980555 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00901-4.


Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.

Morris S, Alsaidi A, Verbyla A, Cruz A, Macfarlane C, Bauer J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022; 112(6):1318-1328.

PMID: 36149409 PMC: 9828439. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2754.


Pharmacogenetic testing for adverse drug reaction prevention: systematic review of economic evaluations and the appraisal of quality matters for clinical practice and implementation.

Turongkaravee S, Jittikoon J, Rochanathimoke O, Boyd K, Wu O, Chaikledkaew U BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):1042.

PMID: 34600523 PMC: 8487501. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07025-8.


Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review.

Karamperis K, Koromina M, Papantoniou P, Skokou M, Kanellakis F, Mitropoulos K Pharmacogenomics J. 2021; 21(4):533-541.

PMID: 34215853 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00249-1.

References
1.
Chou W, Yan F, De Leon J, Barnhill J, Rogers T, Cronin M . Extension of a pilot study: impact from the cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphism on outcome and costs associated with severe mental illness. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000; 20(2):246-51. DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200004000-00019. View

2.
Bradford L . CYP2D6 allele frequency in European Caucasians, Asians, Africans and their descendants. Pharmacogenomics. 2002; 3(2):229-43. DOI: 10.1517/14622416.3.2.229. View

3.
Gildengers A, Houck P, Mulsant B, Pollock B, Mazumdar S, Miller M . Course and rate of antidepressant response in the very old. J Affect Disord. 2002; 69(1-3):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00334-2. View

4.
Higashi M, Veenstra D . Managed care in the genomics era: assessing the cost effectiveness of genetic tests. Am J Manag Care. 2003; 9(7):493-500. View

5.
Roberts R, Mulder R, Joyce P, Luty S, Kennedy M . No evidence of increased adverse drug reactions in cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 poor metabolizers treated with fluoxetine or nortriptyline. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004; 19(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1002/hup.539. View