» Articles » PMID: 28028392

Effect of Pseudocereal-Based Breakfast Meals on the First and Second Meal Glucose Tolerance in Healthy and Diabetic Subjects

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Dec 29
PMID 28028392
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many studies have indicated that the incidence of serious diabetic complications may be reduced through strict glycemic control. A low glycemic index diet is one tool to improve insulin resistance and improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Aim: The objective was to study the effect of pseudocereals-based breakfasts (quinoa and buckwheat) on glucose variations at first meal (breakfast) and second meal (standardised lunch) in healthy and diabetic subjects.

Subjects And Methods: Twelve healthy subjects and 12 patients with Type 2 DM (not- insulin dependent) were recruited in the study. Subjects were provided with quinoa and buckwheat breakfast meals. A standardised lunch was provided 4 h after breakfast. Postprandial blood glucose response after breakfast and the second meal effect was measured in healthy and diabetic subjects. Incremental area under the curve (IAUC) values for glucose was measured in response to the breakfast and lunch. The glycemic index of the 2 pseudocereals-based test breakfasts was determined. A white wheat bread (WWB) was served as a reference breakfast meal.

Results: In post-breakfast analyses, healthy subjects showed that buckwheat meal had significantly lower IAUC values for blood glucose compared to WWB reference meal (P < 0.001) while quinoa meal showed no significance. In diabetic subjects, buckwheat and quinoa meals had significantly lower IAUC values for blood glucose compared to WWB reference meal (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05 respectively). Blood glucose concentrations started to decline gradually for the quinoa and buckwheat but not for WWB in all healthy and diabetic subjects and returned to near-fasting baseline levels by 210 min. Post-lunch analyses indicated higher IAUC for the two breakfast types in healthy and diabetic subjects. In addition, the quinoa and buckwheat breakfast meals were followed by a significantly flatter blood glucose response to the second meal for the period between 270 and 330 min. At the end of the second meal period, values were below or near-fasting baseline levels in the breakfast period. The blood glucose concentration after consuming quinoa meal showed a high peak at 30 min similar to that of WWB reference meal. This peak resulted in a high glycemic index (GI) for quinoa (89.4). The GI of buckwheat recorded a low value (26.8).

Conclusion: The two studied pseudocereals; quinoa and buckwheat have high potential to improve glucose tolerance at the first and second meal (lunch) and are recommended to be introduced in our daily diet for healthy and diabetic subjects.

Citing Articles

Fresh-Cooked but Not Cold-Stored Millet Exhibited Remarkable Second Meal Effect Independent of Resistant Starch: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Peng X, Fan Z, Wei J, Liu R, Lou X, Hu J Nutrients. 2024; 16(23.

PMID: 39683424 PMC: 11643557. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234030.


Plant-Based Diets and Phytochemicals in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Prevention of Its Complications: A Review.

Ansari P, Khan J, Chowdhury S, Reberio A, Kumar S, Seidel V Nutrients. 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39519546 PMC: 11547802. DOI: 10.3390/nu16213709.


Effects of quinoa on cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a review.

Zhang H, Li R Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1470834.

PMID: 39430786 PMC: 11487239. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1470834.


Glycaemia Fluctuations Improvement in Old-Age Prediabetic Subjects Consuming a Quinoa-Based Diet: A Pilot Study.

Diaz-Rizzolo D, Acar-Denizli N, Kostov B, Roura E, Siso-Almirall A, Delicado P Nutrients. 2022; 14(11).

PMID: 35684131 PMC: 9183167. DOI: 10.3390/nu14112331.


Blackcurrant () lowers sugar-induced postprandial glycaemia independently and in a product with fermented quinoa: a randomised crossover trial.

Lappi J, Raninen K, Vakevainen K, Karlund A, Torronen R, Kolehmainen M Br J Nutr. 2020; 126(5):708-717.

PMID: 33161904 PMC: 8340457. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520004468.


References
1.
Mithila M, Khanum F . Effectual comparison of quinoa and amaranth supplemented diets in controlling appetite; a biochemical study in rats. J Food Sci Technol. 2015; 52(10):6735-41. PMC: 4573157. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-014-1691-1. View

2.
Skrabanja V, Liljeberg Elmstahl H, Kreft I, Bjorck I . Nutritional properties of starch in buckwheat products: studies in vitro and in vivo. J Agric Food Chem. 2001; 49(1):490-6. DOI: 10.1021/jf000779w. View

3.
Kaur B, Ranawana V, Teh A, Henry C . The impact of a low glycemic index (GI) breakfast and snack on daily blood glucose profiles and food intake in young Chinese adult males. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2017; 2(3):92-98. PMC: 5684963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2015.05.002. View

4.
Jenkins D, Wolever T, Taylor R, Griffiths C, Krzeminska K, Lawrie J . Slow release dietary carbohydrate improves second meal tolerance. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982; 35(6):1339-46. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/35.6.1339. View

5.
Berti C, Riso P, Monti L, Porrini M . In vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glucose response of gluten-free foods and their gluten counterparts. Eur J Nutr. 2004; 43(4):198-204. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-004-0459-1. View