» Articles » PMID: 28025668

Ericoid Roots and Mycospheres Govern Plant-Specific Bacterial Communities in Boreal Forest Humus

Overview
Journal Microb Ecol
Date 2016 Dec 28
PMID 28025668
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the bacterial populations of roots and mycospheres of the boreal pine forest ericoid plants, heather (Calluna vulgaris), bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), and lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), were studied by qPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS). All bacterial communities of mycosphere soils differed from soils uncolonized by mycorrhizal mycelia. Colonization by mycorrhizal hyphae increased the total number of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene copies in the humus but decreased the number of different bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Nevertheless, ericoid roots and mycospheres supported numerous OTUs not present in uncolonized humus. Bacterial communities in bilberry mycospheres were surprisingly similar to those in pine mycospheres but not to bacterial communities in heather and lingonberry mycospheres. In contrast, bacterial communities of ericoid roots were more similar to each other than to those of pine roots. In all sample types, the relative abundances of bacterial sequences belonging to Alphaproteobacteria and Acidobacteria were higher than the sequences belonging to other classes. Soil samples contained more Actinobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Opitutae, and Planctomycetia, whereas Armatimonadia, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Sphingobacteriia were more common to roots. All mycosphere soils and roots harbored bacteria unique to that particular habitat. Our study suggests that the habitation by ericoid plants increases the overall bacterial diversity of boreal forest soils.

Citing Articles

Bacterial community composition of wheat aboveground compartments correlates with yield during the reproductive phase.

Fu X, Ma Y, Yang T, He S, Wang D, Jin L Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(9):e0107824.

PMID: 39212378 PMC: 11409648. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01078-24.


Bacterial and fungal communities in sub-Arctic tundra heaths are shaped by contrasting snow accumulation and nutrient availability.

Mannisto M, Ahonen S, Ganzert L, Tiirola M, Stark S, Haggblom M FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024; 100(4).

PMID: 38549428 PMC: 10996926. DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiae036.


Carbendazim Modulates the Metabolically Active Bacterial Populations in Soil and Rhizosphere.

Chauhan S, Yadav U, Bano N, Kumar S, Fatima T, Anshu Curr Microbiol. 2023; 80(9):280.

PMID: 37439951 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-023-03391-0.


Insight into the Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Bacterial Communities Inhabiting Blueberries in Portugal.

Goncalves A, Sanchez-Juanes F, Meirinho S, Silva L, Alves G, Flores-Felix J Microorganisms. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36363783 PMC: 9695653. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10112193.


Bacteria Community Inhabiting Fruiting Body and Associated Wood of Different Decay Classes.

Ren W, Penttila R, Kasanen R, Asiegbu F Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:864619.

PMID: 35591994 PMC: 9111749. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864619.


References
1.
Warmink J, van Elsas J . Selection of bacterial populations in the mycosphere of Laccaria proxima: is type III secretion involved?. ISME J. 2008; 2(8):887-900. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2008.41. View

2.
Raynaud X, Nunan N . Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e87217. PMC: 3905020. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087217. View

3.
Ofek-Lalzar M, Sela N, Goldman-Voronov M, Green S, Hadar Y, Minz D . Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4950. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5950. View

4.
Vetrovsky T, Baldrian P . The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e57923. PMC: 3583900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057923. View

5.
Izumi H, Finlay R . Ectomycorrhizal roots select distinctive bacterial and ascomycete communities in Swedish subarctic forests. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 13(3):819-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02393.x. View