» Articles » PMID: 28011585

The Role of Sympathetic and Vagal Cardiac Control on Complexity of Heart Rate Dynamics

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 25
PMID 28011585
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) by nonlinear approaches has been gaining interest due to their ability to extract additional information from heart rate (HR) dynamics that are not detectable by traditional approaches. Nevertheless, the physiological interpretation of nonlinear approaches remains unclear. Therefore, we propose long-term (60 min) protocols involving selective blockade of cardiac autonomic receptors to investigate the contribution of sympathetic and parasympathetic function upon nonlinear dynamics of HRV. Conscious male Wistar rats had their electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded under three distinct conditions: basal, selective (atenolol or atropine), or combined (atenolol plus atropine) pharmacological blockade of autonomic muscarinic or β-adrenergic receptors. Time series of RR interval were assessed by multiscale entropy (MSE) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Entropy over short (1 to 5, MSE) and long (6 to 30, MSE) time scales was computed, as well as DFA scaling exponents at short (α, 5 ≤ ≤ 15), mid (α, 30 ≤ ≤ 200), and long (α, 200 ≤ ≤ 1,700) window sizes. The results show that MSE is reduced under atropine blockade and MSE is reduced under atropine, atenolol, or combined blockade. In addition, while atropine expressed its maximal effect at scale six, the effect of atenolol on MSE increased with scale. For DFA, α decreased during atenolol blockade, while the α increased under atropine blockade. Double blockade decreased α and increased α Results with surrogate data show that the dynamics during combined blockade is not random. In summary, sympathetic and vagal control differently affect entropy (MSE) and fractal properties (DFA) of HRV. These findings are important to guide future studies. Although multiscale entropy (MSE) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) are recognizably useful prognostic/diagnostic methods, their physiological interpretation remains unclear. The present study clarifies the effect of the cardiac autonomic control on MSE and DFA, assessed during long periods (1 h). These findings are important to help the interpretation of future studies.

Citing Articles

Tracking autonomic nervous system activity using surface ECG: Personalized, multiparametric evaluation.

Shusterman V, Swenne C, Hoffman S, Strollo P, London B J Electrocardiol. 2024; 88():153837.

PMID: 39615267 PMC: 11717603. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153837.


State- and frequency-dependence in autonomic rebalance mediated by intradermal auricular electroacupuncture stimulation.

Yang S, Wu Y, Zhan Z, Pan Y, Jiang J Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1367266.

PMID: 38846714 PMC: 11153749. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1367266.


Investigating autonomic nervous system dysfunction among patients with post-COVID condition and prolonged cardiovascular symptoms.

da Silva F, Bonifacio L, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Joaquim L, Dias D, Romano M Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1216452.

PMID: 37901410 PMC: 10603238. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1216452.


Autonomic complexity dynamically indexes affect regulation in everyday life.

Stange J, Li J, Xu E, Ye Z, Zapetis S, Phanord C J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023; 132(7):847-866.

PMID: 37410429 PMC: 10592626. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000849.


Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach.

Oliveira N, Oliveira A, Costa S, Piropo U, Teles M, Freitas V Entropy (Basel). 2023; 25(6).

PMID: 37372226 PMC: 10296899. DOI: 10.3390/e25060883.