» Articles » PMID: 28009736

Esophageal Cancer: Associations With (pN+) Lymph Node Metastases

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the associations of lymph node metastases (pN+), number of positive nodes, and pN subclassification with cancer, treatment, patient, geographic, and institutional variables, and to recommend extent of lymphadenectomy needed to accurately detect pN+ for esophageal cancer.

Summary Background Data: Limited data and traditional analytic techniques have precluded identifying intricate associations of pN+ with other cancer, treatment, and patient characteristics.

Methods: Data on 5806 esophagectomy patients from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration were analyzed by Random Forest machine learning techniques.

Results: pN+, number of positive nodes, and pN subclassification were associated with increasing depth of cancer invasion (pT), increasing cancer length, decreasing cancer differentiation (G), and more regional lymph nodes resected. Lymphadenectomy necessary to accurately detect pN+ is 60 for shorter, well-differentiated cancers (<2.5 cm) and 20 for longer, poorly differentiated ones.

Conclusions: In esophageal cancer, pN+, increasing number of positive nodes, and increasing pN classification are associated with deeper invading, longer, and poorly differentiated cancers. Consequently, if the goal of lymphadenectomy is to accurately define pN+ status of such cancers, few nodes need to be removed. Conversely, superficial, shorter, and well-differentiated cancers require a more extensive lymphadenectomy to accurately define pN+ status.

Citing Articles

Identification and validation of LINC02381 as a biomarker associated with lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Liang J, Zhao Z, Xie Y, Lai D, Okereke I, Velotta J Transl Cancer Res. 2025; 14(1):613-625.

PMID: 39974376 PMC: 11833366. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-2024-2402.


Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Naemi A, Tashk A, Sorayaie Azar A, Samimi T, Tavassoli G, Bagherzadeh Mohasefi A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941923 PMC: 11817159. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030558.


Preoperative identification of small metastatic lymph nodes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using CT radiomics of lymph nodes.

Wu Y, Wu L, Ou J, Tang S, Cao J, Fu M Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(3):1123-1132.

PMID: 39305294 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04585-1.


Quantity Over Quality? Dutch Surgeons' Perceptions About Lymph Node Dissection During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Shah S, Khan A, Seder C Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(12):7659-7660.

PMID: 39068311 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15908-3.


Special requirements for TNM-staging in esophageal cancer.

Sundbom M, Linder G J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(6):3535-3539.

PMID: 38983140 PMC: 11228716. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1898.


References
1.
Rizk N, Ishwaran H, Rice T, Chen L, Schipper P, Kesler K . Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 251(1):46-50. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee. View

2.
Rice T, Blackstone E . Lymph node ratio: a confounded quotient. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96(2):744. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.102. View

3.
Rice T, Rusch V, Ishwaran H, Blackstone E . Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals. Cancer. 2010; 116(16):3763-73. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25146. View

4.
Rice T, Zuccaro Jr G, Adelstein D, Rybicki L, Blackstone E, Goldblum J . Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 65(3):787-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)01387-8. View

5.
Rice T, Rusch V, Apperson-Hansen C, Allen M, Chen L, Hunter J . Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus. 2009; 22(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00901.x. View