» Articles » PMID: 28007621

Instability of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatments in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During 1 Year

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2016 Dec 24
PMID 28007621
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For optimal end-of-life decision-making, it is important to understand the stability of patients' treatment preferences. The aim of this paper is to examine the stability of willingness to accept life-sustaining treatments during 1-year follow-up in Dutch patients with advanced chronic organ failure. In addition, we want to explore the association between willingness to accept high-burden treatment and preferences for CPR and mechanical ventilation (MV).

Methods: In this multicenter longitudinal study, 265 clinically stable outpatients with advanced COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage III/IV [n = 105]), chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III/IV [n = 80]), or chronic renal failure (requiring dialysis [n = 80) were visited at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 months to assess the stability of life-sustaining treatment preferences using the Willingness to Accept Life-sustaining Treatment instrument.

Results: Two hundred six patients completed 1-year follow-up (mean age, 67.2 years [SD, 13.1 years]; 64.1% men). Overall, proportions of patients who were willing to accept life-sustaining treatment during 1 year did not change over time. However, individual trajectories showed that about two-thirds of patients changed their preferences at least once during a year. Moreover, there was no association found between the stability of willingness to undergo high-burden therapy and the stability of preferences for CPR and MV.

Conclusions: The current findings show the complexity of preferences for end-of-life care and indicate once again that advance care planning is a continuous process between patients and physicians, in which preferences for specific situations are discussed and that needs to be regularly reevaluated to deliver high-quality end-of-life care.

Clinical Trial Registration: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 1552).

Citing Articles

When should Home-visit nurses initiate end-of-life discussions for patients with Organ failure and family caregivers? A qualitative study.

Asaumi K, Oki M, Murakami Y BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1):258.

PMID: 37550676 PMC: 10405459. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01401-x.


Dialysis Patients' Preferences on Resuscitation: A Cross-Sectional Study Design.

Alzayer H, Geraghty A, Sebastian K, Panesar H, Reddan D Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022; 9:20543581221113383.

PMID: 35923181 PMC: 9340425. DOI: 10.1177/20543581221113383.


Effect of the Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens with Cancer Intervention on Sustainability of Congruence About End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Needle J, Friebert S, Thompkins J, Grossoehme D, Baker J, Jiang J JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(7):e2220696.

PMID: 35819787 PMC: 9277499. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20696.


Care preferences in physician orders for life sustaining treatment in California nursing homes.

Jennings L, Wenger N, Liang L, Parikh P, Powell D, Escarce J J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022; 70(7):2040-2050.

PMID: 35275398 PMC: 9283229. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17737.


End-of-Life Care Preferences of Older Patients with Multimorbidity: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

Gonzalez-Gonzalez A, Schmucker C, Nothacker J, Nury E, Dinh T, Brueckle M J Clin Med. 2021; 10(1).

PMID: 33383951 PMC: 7795676. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010091.