» Articles » PMID: 28007394

Limited Interaction of a Self-adhesive Flowable Composite with Dentin/enamel Characterized by TEM

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 Dec 24
PMID 28007394
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: A new category of composite which does not require any acid etching or bonding protocol prior to application has been introduced. The purpose of this study was to characterize the interfacial ultra-structure at enamel and dentin surfaces by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Methods: Non-carious human third molars were randomly divided into 6 groups (bur-cut dentin, SiC-ground dentin, fractured dentin, bur-cut enamel, SiC-ground enamel, and un-cut enamel). After preparation of the respective surfaces, the self-adhesive flowable composite (Vertise Flow, Kerr) was applied. Non-demineralized/demineralized and non-stained/stained sections of 70-90nm were prepared following common TEM-specimen processing procedures. Additional specimens were immersed in an ammoniacal silver nitrate solution.

Results: The composite-dentin interface was free of voids and no de-bonding occurred during specimen preparation. For bur-cut and SiC-ground dentin, no surface demineralization was observed and the smear contained residual hydroxyapatite. On fractured dentin (i.e. without smear interference), a very thin interaction area of 100-200nm without apparent signs of surface demineralization was seen. When the composite was bonded to enamel, a distinct separation between the self-adhesive composite and enamel was present in all three groups. A tight interaction, yet without distinct dissolution of hydroxyapatite, could only be seen in some regions at bur-cut enamel where smear was absent or sparse. Silver nitrate infiltration was associated with the presence of smear.

Significance: The self-adhesive composite showed limited interaction with smear-covered substrates and aprismatic enamel, which explains its inferior diminished bonding capacity in comparison with current adhesives.

Citing Articles

Proposal of a Modular Classification System for Direct Dental Resin Composites Based on Clinical Applications.

Francois P, Izart M, Fasham T, Smail Y, Jannot M, Le Goff S Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40076058 PMC: 11902481. DOI: 10.3390/polym17050564.


Assessment of Surface Roughness, Color, and Bonding Efficacy: Self-Adhesive vs. Conventional Flowable Resin.

Leal C, Viana B, Miranda S, Lima R, Silva C, Lins R Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339019 PMC: 11435053. DOI: 10.3390/polym16182556.


Bond Strength, Microleakage, Microgaps, and Marginal Adaptation of Self-adhesive Resin Composites to Tooth Substrates with and without Preconditioning with Universal Adhesives.

Elraggal A, Raheem I, Holiel A, Alhotan A, Alshabib A, Silikas N J Adhes Dent. 2024; 26():53-64.

PMID: 38329120 PMC: 11740777. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b4949691.


Iontophoresis effects of two-step self-etch and total-etch systems on dentin permeability and sealing of composite restoration under simulated pulpal pressure.

Ajcharanukul O, Santikulluk P, Sasingha P, Sabpawat S, Sukyanan K BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):574.

PMID: 36482395 PMC: 9730621. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02632-1.


Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Resin Composite.

Sibai N, El Mourad A, Al Suhaibani N, Al Ahmadi R, Al Dosary S Int J Dent. 2022; 2022:6280624.

PMID: 35572356 PMC: 9106484. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6280624.