» Articles » PMID: 28004838

Genome-wide Analysis of Long-term Evolutionary Domestication in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Dec 23
PMID 28004838
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Experimental evolutionary genomics now allows biologists to test fundamental theories concerning the genetic basis of adaptation. We have conducted one of the longest laboratory evolution experiments with any sexually-reproducing metazoan, Drosophila melanogaster. We used next-generation resequencing data from this experiment to examine genome-wide patterns of genetic variation over an evolutionary time-scale that approaches 1,000 generations. We also compared measures of variation within and differentiation between our populations to simulations based on a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Our analysis yielded no clear evidence of hard selective sweeps, whereby natural selection acts to increase the frequency of a newly-arising mutation in a population until it becomes fixed. We do find evidence for selection acting on standing genetic variation, as independent replicate populations exhibit similar population-genetic dynamics, without obvious fixation of candidate alleles under selection. A hidden-Markov model test for selection also found widespread evidence for selection. We found more genetic variation genome-wide, and less differentiation between replicate populations genome-wide, than arose in any of our simulated evolutionary scenarios.

Citing Articles

Selection with two alleles of X-linkage and its application to the fitness component analysis of OdsH in Drosophila.

Sun S, Ting C, Wu C G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39001870 PMC: 11537805. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae157.


How predictable is adaptation from standing genetic variation? Experimental evolution in highlights the central role of redundancy and linkage disequilibrium.

Schlotterer C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1877):20220046.

PMID: 37004724 PMC: 10067264. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0046.


Adaptation in Outbred Sexual Yeast is Repeatable, Polygenic and Favors Rare Haplotypes.

Linder R, Zabanavar B, Majumder A, Hoang H, Delgado V, Tran R Mol Biol Evol. 2022; 39(12).

PMID: 36366952 PMC: 9728589. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac248.


Long-term gut microbiome dynamics in reveal environment-specific associations between bacterial taxa at the family level.

Mazzucco R, Schlotterer C Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1965):20212193.

PMID: 34905708 PMC: 8670958. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2193.


Evolution, Chance, and Aging.

Frankel S, Rogina B Front Genet. 2021; 12:733184.

PMID: 34567083 PMC: 8458753. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.733184.


References
1.
Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(14):1754-60. PMC: 2705234. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. View

2.
Fiston-Lavier A, Singh N, Lipatov M, Petrov D . Drosophila melanogaster recombination rate calculator. Gene. 2010; 463(1-2):18-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.04.015. View

3.
Dobzhansky T, Wright S . Genetics of Natural Populations. V. Relations between Mutation Rate and Accumulation of Lethals in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1941; 26(1):23-51. PMC: 1209120. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/26.1.23. View

4.
Turner T, Stewart A, Fields A, Rice W, Tarone A . Population-based resequencing of experimentally evolved populations reveals the genetic basis of body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(3):e1001336. PMC: 3060078. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336. View

5.
Mackay T, Richards S, Stone E, Barbadilla A, Ayroles J, Zhu D . The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature. 2012; 482(7384):173-8. PMC: 3683990. DOI: 10.1038/nature10811. View