» Articles » PMID: 28004439

Prediction of Fetal Growth Restriction Using Estimated Fetal Weight Vs a Combined Screening Model in the Third Trimester

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 23
PMID 28004439
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the performance of third-trimester screening, based on estimated fetal weight centile (EFWc) vs a combined model including maternal baseline characteristics, fetoplacental ultrasound and maternal biochemical markers, for the prediction of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates and late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Methods: This was a nested case-control study within a prospective cohort of 1590 singleton gestations undergoing third-trimester (32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation) evaluation. Maternal baseline characteristics, mean arterial pressure, fetoplacental ultrasound and circulating biochemical markers (placental growth factor (PlGF), lipocalin-2, unconjugated estriol and inhibin A) were assessed in all women who subsequently delivered a SGA neonate (n = 175), defined as birth weight < 10 centile according to customized standards, and in a control group (n = 875). Among SGA cases, those with birth weight < 3 centile and/or abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and/or abnormal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) were classified as FGR. Logistic regression predictive models were developed for SGA and FGR, and their performance was compared with that obtained using EFWc alone.

Results: In SGA cases, EFWc, CPR Z-score and maternal serum concentrations of unconjugated estriol and PlGF were significantly lower, while mean UtA-PI Z-score and lipocalin-2 and inhibin A concentrations were significantly higher, compared with controls. Using EFWc alone, 52% (area under receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85)) of SGA and 64% (AUC, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91)) of FGR cases were predicted at a 10% false-positive rate. A combined screening model including a-priori risk (maternal characteristics), EFWc, UtA-PI, PlGF and estriol (with lipocalin-2 for SGA) achieved a detection rate of 61% (AUC, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89)) for SGA cases and 77% (AUC, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95)) for FGR. The combined model for the prediction of SGA and FGR performed significantly better than did using EFWc alone (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions: A multivariable integrative model of maternal characteristics, fetoplacental ultrasound and maternal biochemical markers modestly improved the detection of SGA and FGR cases at 32-36 weeks' gestation when compared with screening based on EFWc alone. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citing Articles

Prediction of low birth weight from fetal ultrasound and clinical characteristics: a comparative study between a low- and middle-income and a high-income country.

Sanchez-Martinez S, Marti-Castellote P, Hoodbhoy Z, Bernardino G, Prats-Valero J, Aguado A BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(12).

PMID: 39638610 PMC: 11624760. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016088.


Prediction Model of Late Fetal Growth Restriction with Machine Learning Algorithms.

Lee S, Choi S, Jo Y, Wie J, Shin J, Kim Y Life (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39598319 PMC: 11595523. DOI: 10.3390/life14111521.


MRI assessed placental volume and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study.

Gibbins K, Roberts V, Lo J, Boniface E, Schabel M, Silver R Placenta. 2024; 154:168-175.

PMID: 39018609 PMC: 11368624. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2024.07.007.


Association between maternal mental health-related hospitalisation in the 5 years prior to or during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a population-based retrospective cohort data linkage study in the Northern Territory of Australia.

Dadi A, He V, Brown K, Hazell-Raine K, Reilly N, Giallo R Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024; 46:101063.

PMID: 38659431 PMC: 11040136. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101063.


Association between transabdominal uterine artery Doppler and small-for-gestational-age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhi R, Tao X, Li Q, Yu M, Li H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):659.

PMID: 37704965 PMC: 10500919. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05968-w.