» Articles » PMID: 28003027

Lifetime Body Size and Estrogen-receptor-positive Breast Cancer Risk in the California Teachers Study Cohort

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Dec 23
PMID 28003027
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Obesity is a public health epidemic and an important breast cancer risk factor. The relationship between interrelated body measurements is complex and most studies fail to account for this complexity. We identified key aspects of body size which jointly, over the life-course (since adolescence), are associated with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer risk.

Methods: Among 109,862 women participating in the California Teachers Study cohort, 3844 were diagnosed with invasive ER+ breast cancer between 1997-1998 and December 2011. Based on validated self-reported height and weight at age 18, baseline, and 10-year follow up and waist circumference at 2-year and 10-year follow up, we identified 16 a priori body-size phenotypes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models provided estimates of hazard rate ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Premenopausal breast cancer was influenced by adolescent, but not adult, body size (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.86 for body mass index (BMI; kg/m) ≥25 vs <20 at age 18). Among postmenopausal women currently using hormone therapy, only those with the greatest body size had increased breast cancer risk (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.13-1.64 for height ≥67 inches and adult BMI ≥25 vs height <67). Among postmenopausal women not currently using hormone therapy, the relationship between body size and risk was complex, with the largest effects of adiposity among short women. Among short women, those with gluteal adiposity (HR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.77-4.10) and those who continued to gain weight throughout adulthood (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.60-4.12) were at greatest risk, whereas those who had been overweight/obese since adolescence were not at increased risk (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.84-2.10). Height was associated with a small increased risk, with borderline statistical significance.

Conclusions: Considering absolute body mass in adolescence and at two points in adulthood, dynamic changes in adiposity over time, and body fat distribution, we identified obesity phenotypes associated with ER+ breast cancer risk. Our approach more clearly identifies specific risk groups than do analyses that evaluate similar measures separately. These findings may aid in improving risk prediction models and developing targeted interventions, and may clarify inconsistent findings across studies.

Citing Articles

Mediation effects of metabolites and sex hormones on the relationship between body mass index and breast cancer: Mendelian randomization analysis and mediation analysis.

Yang Y, Chen M, Yang W Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1449956.

PMID: 39640279 PMC: 11617525. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1449956.


Adiposity throughout Adulthood and Risk of Young-Onset Breast Cancer Tumor Subtypes in the Young Women's Health History Study.

Marcus Post L, Pathak D, Hamilton A, Hirko K, Houang R, Guseman E Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(12):1659-1670.

PMID: 39356300 PMC: 11609824. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1067.


Association of physical weight statuses defined by body mass index (BMI) with molecular subtypes of premenopausal breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li X, Li J, Hu Q, Zhang X, Chen F Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 203(3):429-447.

PMID: 37882920 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07139-z.


Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells, Obesity and the Tumor Microenvironment of Breast Cancer.

Ritter A, Kreis N, Hoock S, Solbach C, Louwen F, Yuan J Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36010901 PMC: 9405791. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163908.


Body size in early life and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Yang T, Cairns B, Pirie K, Green J, Beral V, Floud S BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):232.

PMID: 35255844 PMC: 8902765. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09233-9.


References
1.
Lahmann P, Schulz M, Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Tjonneland A, Olsen A . Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Br J Cancer. 2005; 93(5):582-9. PMC: 2361598. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602763. View

2.
Bernstein L, Allen M, Anton-Culver H, Deapen D, Horn-Ross P, Peel D . High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002; 13(7):625-35. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019552126105. View

3.
Colditz G, Rosner B . Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(10):950-64. DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.10.950. View

4.
Fagherazzi G, Guillas G, Boutron-Ruault M, Clavel-Chapelon F, Mesrine S . Body shape throughout life and the risk for breast cancer at adulthood in the French E3N cohort. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012; 22(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328355ec04. View

5.
Han D, Nie J, Bonner M, McCann S, Muti P, Trevisan M . Lifetime adult weight gain, central adiposity, and the risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer in the Western New York exposures and breast cancer study. Int J Cancer. 2006; 119(12):2931-7. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22236. View