» Articles » PMID: 27999208

Detection of 14-3-3 Sigma (σ) Promoter Methylation As a Noninvasive Biomarker Using Blood Samples for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Dec 22
PMID 27999208
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a tumor suppressor gene, 14-3-3 σ has been reported to be frequently methylated in breast cancer. However, the clinical effect of 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation remains to be verified. This study was performed to assess the clinicopathological significance and diagnostic value of 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation in breast cancer. 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation was found to be notably higher in breast cancer than in benign lesions and normal breast tissue samples. We did not observe that 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation was linked to the age status, tumor grade, clinic stage, lymph node status, histological subtype, ER status, PR status, HER2 status, or overall survival of patients with breast cancer. The combined sensitivity, specificity, AUC (area under the curve), positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and post-test probability values (if the pretest probability was 30%) of 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation in blood samples of breast cancer patients vs. healthy subjects were 0.69, 0.99, 0.86, 95, 0.31, 302, and 98%, respectively. Our findings suggest that 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation may be associated with the carcinogenesis of breast cancer and that the use of 14-3-3 σ promoter methylation might represent a useful blood-based biomarker for the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Impact of chronic benzene poisoning on aberrant mitochondrial DNA methylation: A prospective observational study.

Wang D, Lin D, Feng G, Yang X, Deng L, Li P Front Public Health. 2023; 11:990051.

PMID: 36817889 PMC: 9937586. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.990051.


Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Characterization and Determination of the Cancer Origin in Malignant Liver Tumors.

Draskovic T, Zidar N, Hauptman N Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36765815 PMC: 9913861. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030859.


Screening of tumor grade-related mRNAs and lncRNAs for Esophagus Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Gao X, Liu Q, Chen X, Chen S, Yang J, Liu Q J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 35(6):e23797.

PMID: 33960436 PMC: 8183932. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23797.


Machine Learning Models to Improve the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: A Multicenter External Validation Study.

Huo L, Tan Y, Wang S, Geng C, Li Y, Ma X Cancer Manag Res. 2021; 13:3367-3379.

PMID: 33889025 PMC: 8057795. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S297794.


Methylation as a critical epigenetic process during tumor progressions among Iranian population: an overview.

Akhlaghipour I, Bina A, Abbaszadegan M, Moghbeli M Genes Environ. 2021; 43(1):14.

PMID: 33883026 PMC: 8059047. DOI: 10.1186/s41021-021-00187-1.


References
1.
Sharma G, Mirza S, Parshad R, Gupta S, Ralhan R . DNA methylation of circulating DNA: a marker for monitoring efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2012; 33(6):1837-43. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-012-0443-y. View

2.
Ngollo M, Dagdemir A, Karsli-Ceppioglu S, Judes G, Pajon A, Penault-Llorca F . Epigenetic modifications in prostate cancer. Epigenomics. 2014; 6(4):415-26. DOI: 10.2217/epi.14.34. View

3.
FERGUSON A, Evron E, Umbricht C, Pandita T, Chan T, Hermeking H . High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3 sigma locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(11):6049-54. PMC: 18556. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.100566997. View

4.
Yin X, Xiang T, Mu J, Mao H, Li L, Huang X . Protocadherin 17 functions as a tumor suppressor suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling and cell metastasis and is frequently methylated in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(32):51720-51732. PMC: 5239510. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10102. View

5.
Maziveyi M, Alahari S . Breast Cancer Tumor Suppressors: A Special Emphasis on Novel Protein Nischarin. Cancer Res. 2015; 75(20):4252-9. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1395. View