» Articles » PMID: 27998996

Effective Amygdala-prefrontal Connectivity Predicts Individual Differences in Successful Emotion Regulation

Overview
Date 2016 Dec 22
PMID 27998996
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to voluntarily regulate our emotional response to threatening and highly arousing stimuli by using cognitive reappraisal strategies is essential for our mental and physical well-being. This might be achieved by prefrontal brain regions (e.g. inferior frontal gyrus, IFG) down-regulating activity in the amygdala. It is unknown, to which degree effective connectivity within the emotion-regulation network is linked to individual differences in reappraisal skills. Using psychophysiological interaction analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, we examined changes in inter-regional connectivity between the amygdala and IFG with other brain regions during reappraisal of emotional responses and used emotion regulation success as an explicit regressor. During down-regulation of emotion, reappraisal success correlated with effective connectivity between IFG with dorsolateral, dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC). During up-regulation of emotion, effective coupling between IFG with anterior cingulate cortex, dorsomedial and ventromedial PFC as well as the amygdala correlated with reappraisal success. Activity in the amygdala covaried with activity in lateral and medial prefrontal regions during the up-regulation of emotion and correlated with reappraisal success. These results suggest that successful reappraisal is linked to changes in effective connectivity between two systems, prefrontal cognitive control regions and regions crucially involved in emotional evaluation.

Citing Articles

Attenuation processes in positive social emotion upregulation: Disentangling functional role of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Bezmaternykh D, Melnikov M, Petrovskiy E, Mazhirina K, Savelov A, Shtark M iScience. 2025; 28(2):111909.

PMID: 39995856 PMC: 11849593. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111909.


Inter- and intra-subject similarity in network functional connectivity across a full narrative movie.

Mochalski L, Friedrich P, Li X, Kroll J, Eickhoff S, Weis S Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(11):e26802.

PMID: 39086203 PMC: 11291869. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26802.


Increased anger and stress and heightened connectivity between IFG and vmPFC in victims during social interaction.

Rohr A, Kohn N, Bergs R, Clemens B, Lampert A, Spehr M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8471.

PMID: 38605132 PMC: 11009292. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57585-y.


Neural mechanisms of different types of envy: a meta-analysis of activation likelihood estimation methods for brain imaging.

Dai S, Liu Q, Chai H, Zhang W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1335548.

PMID: 38566953 PMC: 10985193. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335548.


Resting-state effective connectivity is systematically linked to reappraisal success of high- and low-intensity negative emotions.

Morawetz C, Berboth S, Bode S Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(5):e26667.

PMID: 38544432 PMC: 10973777. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26667.


References
1.
Bennett C, Wolford G, Miller M . The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010; 4(4):417-22. PMC: 2799957. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp053. View

2.
Bradley M, Miccoli L, Escrig M, Lang P . The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology. 2008; 45(4):602-7. PMC: 3612940. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x. View

3.
Hutcherson C, Plassmann H, Gross J, Rangel A . Cognitive regulation during decision making shifts behavioral control between ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal value systems. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(39):13543-54. PMC: 3689006. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6387-11.2012. View

4.
Ghashghaei H, Barbas H . Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience. 2002; 115(4):1261-79. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00446-3. View

5.
Berking M, Wupperman P . Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012; 25(2):128-34. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503669. View