» Articles » PMID: 27997534

DNA Methylation Signatures of the Plant Chromomethyltransferases

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Dec 21
PMID 27997534
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

DNA methylation in plants is traditionally partitioned into CG, CHG and CHH contexts (with H any nucleotide but G). By investigating DNA methylation patterns in trinucleotide contexts in four angiosperm species, we show that such a representation hides spatial and functional partitioning of different methylation pathways and is incomplete. CG methylation (mCG) is largely context-independent whereas, at CHG motifs, there is under-representation of mCCG in pericentric regions of A. thaliana and tomato and throughout the chromosomes of maize and rice. In A. thaliana the biased representation of mCCG in heterochromatin is related to specificities of H3K9 methyltransferase SUVH family members. At CHH motifs there is an over-representation of different variant forms of mCHH that, similarly to mCCG hypomethylation, is partitioned into the pericentric regions of the two dicots but dispersed in the monocot chromosomes. The over-represented mCHH motifs in A. thaliana associate with specific types of transposon including both class I and II elements. At mCHH the contextual bias is due to the involvement of various chromomethyltransferases whereas the context-independent CHH methylation in A. thaliana and tomato is mediated by the RNA-directed DNA methylation process that is most active in the gene-rich euchromatin. This analysis therefore reveals that the sequence context of the methylome of plant genomes is informative about the mechanisms associated with maintenance of methylation and the overlying chromatin structure.

Citing Articles

Subfunctionalization and epigenetic regulation of a biosynthetic gene cluster in .

Priego-Cubero S, Knoch E, Wang Z, Alseekh S, Braun K, Chapman P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(8):e2420164122.

PMID: 39977312 PMC: 11874288. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2420164122.


Substrate specificity and protein stability drive the divergence of plant-specific DNA methyltransferases.

Jiang J, Gwee J, Fang J, Leichter S, Sanders D, Ji X Sci Adv. 2024; 10(45):eadr2222.

PMID: 39504374 PMC: 11540031. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr2222.


Transcriptional Silencing of 35S rDNA in Correlates with Cytosine Methylation in Sequence-Specific Manner.

Matyasek R, Kalfusova R, Kuderova A, rehurkova K, Sochorova J, Kovarik A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39062783 PMC: 11276851. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147540.


Dynamic evolution of the heterochromatin sensing histone demethylase IBM1.

Zhang Y, Jang H, Luo Z, Dong Y, Xu Y, Kantamneni Y PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(7):e1011358.

PMID: 38991029 PMC: 11265718. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011358.


Methylomes as key features for predicting recombination in some plant species.

Penuela M, Finke J, Rocha C Plant Mol Biol. 2024; 114(2):25.

PMID: 38457042 PMC: 10924001. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-023-01396-8.


References
1.
Lindroth A, Cao X, Jackson J, Zilberman D, McCALLUM C, Henikoff S . Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science. 2001; 292(5524):2077-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1059745. View

2.
Jackson J, Lindroth A, Cao X, Jacobsen S . Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature. 2002; 416(6880):556-60. DOI: 10.1038/nature731. View

3.
Herr A, Jensen M, Dalmay T, Baulcombe D . RNA polymerase IV directs silencing of endogenous DNA. Science. 2005; 308(5718):118-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106910. View

4.
Kanno T, Huettel B, Mette M, Aufsatz W, Jaligot E, Daxinger L . Atypical RNA polymerase subunits required for RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2005; 37(7):761-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng1580. View

5.
Ebbs M, Bender J . Locus-specific control of DNA methylation by the Arabidopsis SUVH5 histone methyltransferase. Plant Cell. 2006; 18(5):1166-76. PMC: 1456864. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.041400. View