» Articles » PMID: 27997259

A New Comprehensive Model for Continuous Professional Development

Overview
Journal Eur J Gen Pract
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 Dec 21
PMID 27997259
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It is generally agreed that continuing professional development (CPD) for GPs is important for quality of care. Internationally, however, different approaches to identify the learning objectives and the CPD content have been chosen.

Objectives: To improve GPs' CPD in Denmark we explore how general practitioners' (GPs) self-experienced learning needs can be combined with learning needs experienced from a societal perspective and still make sense for GPs.

Methods: We performed a multi-dimensional learning needs analysis with a modified Delphi method in a participatory action research set-up. Twenty practice-based small learning groups and a group appointed by the Danish public health service were asked to identify learning needs with the Danish family medicine curriculum as reference. Then we asked a group of GP researchers and hospital consultants, a group of GPs with interests in narrative, person-centred medicine and a group of GP educators, and administrative staff, to triangulate the initial findings.

Results: We identified educational themes through a defined collaborative consensus oriented process. Examples of themes are the diagnostic challenge, care for patients with multi-morbidity, elderly patients and children. Due to variation in requested learning objectives, the identified themes do not cover all relevant areas for CPD training. The identified themes will only make sense if seen as supplementary to other CPD activities based on GPs individual needs analyses.

Conclusion: It is possible to identify prioritized educational themes for GPs through a process involving the majority of stakeholders. Nevertheless, CPD should also include activities based on individual needs analysis. [Box: see text].

Citing Articles

An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in Europe: A Mixed Methods Assessment.

Sherman L, Halila H, Chappell K J CME. 2024; 13(1):2435731.

PMID: 39640915 PMC: 11619014. DOI: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2435731.


Barriers for continuous medical education: a cross-sectional questionnaire study among Danish GPs.

Ibsen H, Ahrenfeldt L, Lykkegaard J, Sondergaard J, Svab I, Kjaer N BJGP Open. 2024; 8(3).

PMID: 38490677 PMC: 11523502. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0228.


"We don't need no education" - a qualitative study of barriers to continuous medical education among Danish general practitioners.

Ibsen H, Lillevang G, Sondergaard J, Kjaer N BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):450.

PMID: 37337212 PMC: 10278246. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04432-9.


What are the current 'top five' perceived educational needs of Irish general practitioners?.

Dowling S, Last J, Finnegan H, OConnor K, Cullen W Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 189(1):381-388.

PMID: 31190220 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02047-y.


Job satisfaction and stressors for working in out-of-hours care - a pilot study with general practitioners in a rural area of Germany.

Leutgeb R, Frankenhauser-Mannuss J, Scheuer M, Szecsenyi J, Goetz K BMC Fam Pract. 2018; 19(1):95.

PMID: 29933743 PMC: 6015473. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0777-7.

References
1.
Colthart I, Cameron N, McKinstry B, Blaney D . What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2008; 58(547):82-7. PMC: 2233956. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X264036. View

2.
Bellande B, Winicur Z, Cox K . Commentary: Urgently needed: a safe place for self-assessment on the path to maintaining competence and improving performance. Acad Med. 2010; 85(1):16-8. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c41b6f. View

3.
Kjaer N, Steenstrup A, Pedersen L, Halling A . Continuous professional development for GPs: experience from Denmark. Postgrad Med J. 2014; 90(1065):383-7. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131679. View

4.
Nagel C, Lenton C . Serving the needs of our future population. Educ Prim Care. 2016; 27(3):177-9. DOI: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1169442. View

5.
Cohen R, Amiel G, Tann M, Shechter A, Weingarten M, Reis S . Performance assessment of community-based physicians: evaluating the reliability and validity of a tool for determining CME needs. Acad Med. 2002; 77(12 Pt 1):1247-54. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00022. View