» Articles » PMID: 27988908

In Support of an Individualized Approach to Assessing Quality of Life: Comparison Between Patient Generated Index and Standardized Measures Across Four Health Conditions

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2016 Dec 19
PMID 27988908
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Individualized measures of health-related quality life (HRQL) have been used for decades and shown to provide unique information, but little work has been done to explain this uniqueness particularly across health conditions.

Aims: To estimate, across four health conditions, the magnitude of the association between scores derived from the Patient Generated Index (PGI) and those from fully standardized generic and disease-specific measures of the HRQL; to identify the extent to which the areas generated from the PGI are covered by the content of the fully standardized measures.

Methods: The PGI and other generic and disease-specific measures had been used in four different samples of people: stroke (n = 222), multiple sclerosis (MS; n = 185); advanced cancer (n = 173), and HIV+ (n = 690). Areas nominated on the PGI were harmonized to a standard nomenclature. Pearson correlations were estimated between PGI and other measures.

Results: Data from 1263 people indicated that PGI provided the lowest rating for HRQL across all health conditions. The areas nominated differed across conditions with walking/mobility: the most common for stroke (42%), work/school for MS (62%), health for HIV+ (97%), and fatigue for cancer (39%). Many of the aspects of health included in generic measures were not nominated using the PGI and vice versa. The highest correlations between the PGI and other measures were observed for people with MS, with correlations between 0.53 and 0.59; lowest correlations were observed for people with HIV and cancer, ≤0.33.

Discussion: The PGI scores reflect those aspects of quality of life that are important to patients in which they would most value an improvement. Heterogeneity in HRQL across health conditions is poorly discriminated using standardized measures. A "one-size-fits-all" approach to HRQL assessment may not provide the most useful representation of this important construct.

Citing Articles

Confirmatory analysis of the 13-MD and ranking of its meta-dimensions and items.

Toure M, Poder T Health Care Sci. 2024; 3(4):249-263.

PMID: 39220430 PMC: 11362658. DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.106.


Adaptation and content validation of measure yourself medical outcomes profile (MYMOP) for 7-11 year-old children.

Ishaque S, Roberts R, Karnon J, Thomas D, Salter A Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(9):2401-2416.

PMID: 38874698 PMC: 11390820. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03702-3.


The Patient Generated Index (PGI) as an early-warning system for predicting brain health challenges: a prospective cohort study for people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

Humayun M, Brouillette M, Fellows L, Mayo N Qual Life Res. 2023; 32(12):3439-3452.

PMID: 37428407 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03475-1.


Advances in the clinical application of orthotic devices for stroke and spinal cord injury since 2013.

Cui Y, Cheng S, Chen X, Xu G, Ma N, Li H Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1108320.

PMID: 36873455 PMC: 9981677. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1108320.


Development of a Prototype for a Bilingual Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of the Important Health Aspects of Quality of Life in People Living with HIV: The Preference Based HIV Index (PB-HIV).

Mate K, Lebouche B, Brouillette M, Fellows L, Mayo N J Pers Med. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36556300 PMC: 9781994. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122080.


References
1.
Griffiths R, Jayasuriya R, Maitland H . Development of a client-generated health outcome measure for community nursing. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000; 24(5):529-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00505.x. View

2.
Mayo N, Moriello C, Asano M, van der Spuy S, Finch L . The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function. Qual Life Res. 2010; 20(5):621-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9801-7. View

3.
Joyce C, Hickey A, McGee H, OBoyle C . A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: the SEIQoL. Qual Life Res. 2003; 12(3):275-80. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023273117040. View

4.
Garratt A . Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(11):2625-35. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1014-7. View

5.
Macduff C, Russell E . The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population. Qual Life Res. 1999; 7(8):761-9. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008831209706. View