» Articles » PMID: 27980713

Sex-specific Differences in Fetal and Infant Growth Patterns: a Prospective Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Biol Sex Differ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Physiology
Date 2016 Dec 17
PMID 27980713
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess whether sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth exist.

Methods: This study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective birth cohort. In total, 8556 live singleton births were included. Fetal growth was assessed by ultrasound. During the first trimester, crown-rump-length (CRL) was measured. In the second and third trimester of pregnancy head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were assessed. Information on infant growth during the first 2 years of life was obtained from Community Health Centers and included HC, body weight and length.

Results: In the first trimester, male CRL was larger than female CRL (0.12 SD [95% CI 0.03,0.22]). From the second trimester onwards, HC and AC were larger in males than in females (0.30 SD [95% CI 0.26,0.34] and 0.09 SD [95% CI 0.05,0.014], respectively). However, FL in males was smaller compared to female fetuses (0.21 SD [95% CI 0.17,0.26]). Repeated measurement analyses showed a different prenatal as well as postnatal HC growth pattern between males and females. A different pattern in body weight was observed with a higher body weight in males until the age of 12 months where after females have a higher body weight.

Conclusions: Sex affects both fetal as well as infant growth. Besides body size, also body proportions differ between males and females with different growth patterns. This sexual dimorphism might arise from differences in fetal programming with sex specific health differences as a consequence in later life.

Citing Articles

Early Life Determinants of Overweight and Obesity in a Sample of Mexico City Preschoolers.

Samano R, Lopezmalo-Casares S, Martinez-Rojano H, Chico-Barba G, Gamboa R, Plascencia-Nieto E Nutrients. 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40005026 PMC: 11858805. DOI: 10.3390/nu17040697.


Exploring fetal growth patterns in the second trimester: insights from ultrasound measurements among the Minangkabau Ethnic Group in Indonesia.

Yusrawati , Serudji J, Utama B, Sari P BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):68.

PMID: 39856642 PMC: 11759424. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07042-5.


Whole Brain MRI Assessment of Age and Sex-Related R2* Changes in the Human Fetal Brain.

Ji L, Duffy M, Chen B, Majbri A, Trentacosta C, Thomason M Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(2):e70073.

PMID: 39844450 PMC: 11754245. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70073.


Osteocalcin in Infancy and Early Childhood and Its Correlation With Later Growth and Body Composition: A Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study.

Berggren S, Dahlgren J, Andersson O, Bergman S, Roswall J Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024; 102(4):427-437.

PMID: 39727029 PMC: 11874053. DOI: 10.1111/cen.15187.


Impact of prenatal exposure to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on birth size and postnatal growth trajectories.

Moore B, Mueller N, Perng W, Sauder K, Hebert E, Hoyt A Pediatr Obes. 2024; 20(1):e13187.

PMID: 39681476 PMC: 11669837. DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.13187.


References
1.
Grumbach M . Estrogen, bone, growth and sex: a sea change in conventional wisdom. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 13 Suppl 6:1439-55. DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2000-s619. View

2.
de Jong C, Gardosi J, Baldwin C, Francis A, Dekker G, van Geijn H . Fetal weight gain in a serially scanned high-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 11(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11010039.x. View

3.
Verburg B, Steegers E, de Ridder M, Snijders R, Smith E, Hofman A . New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(4):388-96. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5225. View

4.
Tunon K, Eik-Nes S, Grottum P . A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 8(3):178-85. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08030178.x. View

5.
Hadlock F, Harrist R, Deter R, Park S . Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 138(5):875-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.5.875. View