» Articles » PMID: 27979752

Applying Self-determination Theory to the Blood Donation Context: The Blood Donor Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness Enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) Trial

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Dec 17
PMID 27979752
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Blood Donor Competency, Autonomy, and Relatedness Enhancement (Blood Donor CARE) project was designed as a practical application of self-determination theory to encourage retention of first-time donors. Self-determination theory proposes that people are more likely to persist with behaviors that are internally-motivated, and that externally-motivated behavior can evolve and become internalized given the appropriate socio-environmental conditions. According to self-determination theory, motivation to engage in blood donation may become increasingly self-determined if the behavior satisfies fundamental human needs for competence (a sense of self-efficacy to achieve specific goals), autonomy (a sense of volitional control over one's behavior), and relatedness (a sense of connection to a larger group). The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the effect of competence, autonomy, and/or relatedness interventions on donor retention. Using a full factorial design, first-time donors will be assigned to a control condition or one of seven intervention conditions. Donation competence, autonomy, and relatedness, along with additional constructs associated with return donation, will be assessed before and after the intervention using online surveys, and donation attempts will be tracked for one-year using blood center donor databases. We hypothesize that, compared to the control condition, the interventions will increase the likelihood of a subsequent donation attempt. We will also examine intervention-specific increases in competence, autonomy, and relatedness as potential mediators of enhanced donor retention. By promoting first-time donor competence, autonomy, and relatedness our goal is to enhance internal motivation for giving and in so doing increase the likelihood of future donation.

Citing Articles

Gamification Approach to Provide Support About the Deferral Experience in Blood Donation: Design and Feasibility Study.

Espinoza Chamorro R, Santos L, Mori Y, Liu C, Yamamoto G, Kuroda T JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e50086.

PMID: 38875005 PMC: 11214031. DOI: 10.2196/50086.


Discussion on the recruitment strategy for apheresis platelet donors in Chongqing during a public health emergency.

Cheng Y, Xie C, Tian Y, Wang F, Liu X, Cheng D Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1365433.

PMID: 38651129 PMC: 11034425. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365433.


Blood donation motivators and barriers reported by young, first-time whole blood donors: Examining the association of reported motivators and barriers with subsequent donation behavior and potential sex, race, and ethnic group differences.

France C, France J, Ysidron D, Martin C, Duffy L, Kessler D Transfusion. 2022; 62(12):2539-2554.

PMID: 36281204 PMC: 9742189. DOI: 10.1111/trf.17162.


The influence of service quality and anticipated emotions on donor loyalty: an empirical analysis in blood centres in Spain.

Martin-Santana J, Melian-Alzola L Health Care Manag Sci. 2022; 25(4):623-648.

PMID: 35841450 PMC: 9674737. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-022-09600-9.


What would it take to convince you to donate? A survey study of the relationship between motivators, barriers, and payment for whole blood, plasma, and platelet donation.

France C, France J, Himawan L Transfusion. 2022; 62(6):1251-1260.

PMID: 35467768 PMC: 9322277. DOI: 10.1111/trf.16886.


References
1.
Schreiber G, Sanchez A, Glynn S, Wright D . Increasing blood availability by changing donation patterns. Transfusion. 2003; 43(5):591-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00388.x. View

2.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

3.
Robinson N, Masser B, White K, Hyde M, Terry D . Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: an extended theory of planned behavior. Transfusion. 2008; 48(12):2559-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01904.x. View

4.
Kalargirou A, Beloukas A, Kosma A, Nanou C, Saridi M, Kriebardis A . Attitudes and behaviours of Greeks concerning blood donation: recruitment and retention campaigns should be focused on need rather than altruism. Blood Transfus. 2014; 12(3):320-9. PMC: 4111812. DOI: 10.2450/2014.0203-13. View

5.
Chan D, Fung Y, Xing S, Hagger M . Myopia prevention, near work, and visual acuity of college students: integrating the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. J Behav Med. 2013; 37(3):369-80. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-013-9494-9. View