Pathways From Socioeconomic Status to Prenatal Smoking: A Test of the Reserve Capacity Model

Overview

Journal Nurs Res

Specialty Nursing

Date 2016 Dec 16

PMID 27977563

Citations 8

Authors

Irene Yang

Lynne A Hall

Kristin Ashford

Sudeshna Paul

Barbara Polivka

S Lee Ridner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Low-income, unemployed women with low levels of education are more likely to smoke during pregnancy compared to their higher-income, employed, and well-educated counterparts. The reserve capacity model (RCM) offers a theoretical framework to explain how psychosocial factors may serve as pathways connecting socioeconomic status (SES) to health behaviors. Research supports the link between prenatal smoking and several psychosocial variables such as chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and social support. How these variables interrelate to explain the predominance of prenatal smoking in lower socioeconomic groups of pregnant women has not been fully elucidated.

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the RCM to evaluate the roles of early pregnancy levels of chronic stress, quality of the primary intimate relationship, and depressive symptoms in explaining the relationship between SES and persistent prenatal smoking.

Methods: A secondary analysis of data from 370 pregnant nonsmokers, spontaneous quitters, and persistent prenatal smokers was conducted. On the basis of the RCM, chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and the quality of the primary intimate relationship were evaluated as potential mediating variables linking SES with persistent prenatal smoking using path analysis.

Results: Path analyses indicated that a simple model with all three psychosocial variables as mediators of the relationship between SES and persistent prenatal smoking provided the best fit.

Discussion: Findings indicated that chronic stressors, depressive symptoms, and the quality of the primary intimate relationship play important roles in the pathway from SES to prenatal smoking status. This knowledge can assist in the development of prevention and intervention strategies to target these variables and ultimately reduce prenatal smoking.

Citing Articles

The Connection Between Stress and Women's Smoking During the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review.

Miguez M, Queiro Y, Posse C, Val A Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851381 PMC: 11764003. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010013.

Effects of Socioeconomic Status on the Health of Menopausal Mothers in Multicultural Families in Korea: A Test of the Reserve Capacity Model.

Park M, Lee J J Immigr Minor Health. 2024; 27(2):277-285.

PMID: 39709320 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-024-01662-x.

Does social need fulfillment moderate the association between socioeconomic status and health risk behaviours during pregnancy?.

Weiland S, Jansen D, Groen H, de Jong D, Erwich J, Berger M Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(5):929-935.

PMID: 38894504 PMC: 11431046. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae102.

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Environmental Exposures on Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children: Empirical Evidence, Potential Mechanisms, and Implications.

Gladieux M, Gimness N, Rodriguez B, Liu J Toxics. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36977024 PMC: 10055754. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11030259.

Factors Affecting Depression in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men Living Alone: A Cross-Sectional Path Analysis Model.

Choi H, Lee J Am J Mens Health. 2022; 16(1):15579883221078134.

PMID: 35184578 PMC: 8864270. DOI: 10.1177/15579883221078134.

References

Cohen S, Wills T . Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98(2):310-57. View

Gallo L, Matthews K . Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role?. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(1):10-51. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.10. View

Nichter M, Nichter M, Muramoto M, Adrian S, Goldade K, Tesler L . Smoking among low-income pregnant women: an ethnographic analysis. Health Educ Behav. 2007; 34(5):748-64. DOI: 10.1177/1090198106290397. View

Bullock L, Mears J, Woodcock C, Record R . Retrospective study of the association of stress and smoking during pregnancy in rural women. Addict Behav. 2001; 26(3):405-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00118-0. View

Manuel J, Martinson M, Bledsoe-Mansori S, Bellamy J . The influence of stress and social support on depressive symptoms in mothers with young children. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75(11):2013-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.034. View

Bullock L, Everett K, Mullen P, Geden E, Longo D, Madsen R . Baby BEEP: A randomized controlled trial of nurses' individualized social support for poor rural pregnant smokers. Matern Child Health J. 2008; 13(3):395-406. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0363-z. View

Penn G, Owen L . Factors associated with continued smoking during pregnancy: analysis of socio-demographic, pregnancy and smoking-related factors. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2002; 21(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1080/09595230220119291. View

Lee S, Song X . Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with dichotomous variables. Stat Med. 2003; 22(19):3073-88. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1544. View

Brondolo E, Brady N, Thompson S, Tobin J, Cassells A, Sweeney M . PERCEIVED RACISM AND NEGATIVE AFFECT: ANALYSES OF TRAIT AND STATE MEASURES OF AFFECT IN A COMMUNITY SAMPLE. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2008; 27(2):150-173. PMC: 2600575. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.2.150. View

10.

Linares Scott T, Heil S, Higgins S, Badger G, Bernstein I . Depressive symptoms predict smoking status among pregnant women. Addict Behav. 2009; 34(8):705-8. PMC: 2708672. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.04.003. View

11.

Bunevicius A, Kusminskas L, Pop V, Pedersen C, Bunevicius R . Screening for antenatal depression with the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 30(4):238-43. DOI: 10.3109/01674820903230708. View

12.

HALL L, Williams C, Greenberg R . Supports, stressors, and depressive symptoms in low-income mothers of young children. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75(5):518-22. PMC: 1646274. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.5.518. View

13.

Bergink V, Kooistra L, Lambregtse-van den Berg M, Wijnen H, Bunevicius R, van Baar A . Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res. 2011; 70(4):385-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008. View

14.

Pletsch P, Morgan S, Pieper A . Context and beliefs about smoking and smoking cessation. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003; 28(5):320-5. DOI: 10.1097/00005721-200309000-00012. View

15.

Higgins S, Heil S, Badger G, Skelly J, Solomon L, Bernstein I . Educational disadvantage and cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 104 Suppl 1:S100-5. PMC: 2763386. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.013. View

16.

Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R . Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 150:782-6. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. View

17.

Tong V, Jones J, Dietz P, DAngelo D, Bombard J . Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 31 sites, 2000-2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009; 58(4):1-29. View

18.

Zhu S, Valbo A . Depression and smoking during pregnancy. Addict Behav. 2002; 27(4):649-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00199-x. View

19.

Crittenden K, Manfredi C, Cho Y, Dolecek T . Smoking cessation processes in low-SES women: the impact of time-varying pregnancy status, health care messages, stress, and health concerns. Addict Behav. 2006; 32(7):1347-66. PMC: 1994069. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.009. View

20.

Pollock M, Amankwaa L, Amankwaa A . First-time fathers and stressors in the postpartum period. J Perinat Educ. 2007; 14(2):19-25. PMC: 1595242. DOI: 10.1624/105812405X44682. View