» Articles » PMID: 27977304

Pharmacodynamics of Combined Estrogen-progestin Oral Contraceptives: 1. Effects on Metabolism

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2016 Dec 16
PMID 27977304
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The risk-benefit profile of any pharmacologic agent must be evaluated against risks connected with the events to be avoided. This is especially true in the case of hormonal contraception, not intended to combat a disease. Over the six decades during which their use has progressively expanded, the risk-benefit profile of combined oral contraceptives (COC) has substantially changed, with new combinations, dosages and mode of administration appearing on the market. Area covered: In a series of articles, recent information on the complex issue of COC risks and benefits will be reviewed in the hope of providing an updated picture. The present article reviews metabolic changes occurring during use of modern combinations of estrogens (ethinyl estradiol, estradiol, estradiol valerate and estetrol) and new progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, dienogest, drospirenone, nomegestrol acetate), often compared to classic compounds, such as levonorgestrel. Three categories of metabolic effects in healthy women are detailed: on carbohydrates, lipid and bone mineral content. Expert commentary: Overall, the picture is reassuring: the new generations of progestins are basically devoid of androgenic, estrogenic or glucocorticoid related side-effects. This should result in an improved safety profile, although past history teaches us that that large comparative and surveillance studies are required before firm conclusions can be drawn. At any rate, available evidence indicates that metabolic effects of third and fourth generation progestins, especially when they are combined with natural estrogens, are minimal and, if used in healthy women, should not cause concern.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) on the Risk of Developing Ovarian Cancer and Thyroid Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.

Mukherjee P, Sanyal S, Chadha S, Mukherjee S Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023; 24(5):562-572.

PMID: 37986267 DOI: 10.2174/0118715303266512231103075551.


Assessment of liver function tests of women taking hormonal contraceptives at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital and Family Guidance Association of Gondar (FGAE), 2022; a comparative cross-sectional study.

Chane E, Wondifraw H, Hadgu R, Fasil A PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289746.

PMID: 37590278 PMC: 10434896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289746.


Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Melin J, Forslund M, Alesi S, Piltonen T, Romualdi D, Spritzer P J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 109(2):e817-e836.

PMID: 37554096 PMC: 10795934. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad465.


Bone impact after two years of low-dose oral contraceptive use during adolescence.

Orsolini L, Goldberg T, Caldeirao T, Cristiane da Silva C, Rizzo A, Biason T PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0285885.

PMID: 37289781 PMC: 10249826. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285885.


Pharmacological and metabolic effects of drospirenone as a progestin-only pill compared to combined formulations with estrogen.

Regidor P, Mueller A, Mayr M Womens Health (Lond). 2023; 19:17455057221147388.

PMID: 36744531 PMC: 9905034. DOI: 10.1177/17455057221147388.