» Articles » PMID: 27966438

Never Ignore Extremely Elevated D-dimer Levels: They Are Specific for Serious Illness

Overview
Journal Neth J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Dec 15
PMID 27966438
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: D-dimer is routinely measured as part of the clinical diagnosis algorithms for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In these algorithms, low D- dimer cut-off values are used to generate a dichotomous test result that is sensitive, but very non-specific for VTE. A consequence of any test dichotomisation is loss of information that is hidden in the continuous spectrum of results. For D-dimer, the information conveyed by extremely elevated results may be particularly relevant. Our aim was to assess the differential diagnosis of extremely elevated D-dimer levels in a hospital setting.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients > 18 years with an extremely elevated (> 5000 μg/l; > 10x cut-off to exclude VTE) D-dimer test result. Electronic medical records were reviewed for diagnoses.

Results: A total of 759 extremely elevated D-dimer results were identified. After exclusion of 120 duplicate cases, 53 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 5 cases without diagnostic information, 581 cases were analysed. Their D-dimer ranged between 5030 and 239,000 μg/l, with a mean of 17,598 μg/l (SD 22,972 μg/l). Altogether, 89% of these patients had a diagnosis of VTE, sepsis and/or cancer. The prevalence was highest for pulmonary embolism (183 patients; 32%), followed by cancer (168 patients; 29%), sepsis (142 patients; 24%), trauma/surgery (142 patients; 24%), and deep vein thrombosis (73 patients; 13%).

Conclusion: Although D-dimer testing has a reputation for being very non-specific, an extremely elevated D-dimer is uniquely associated with severe disease, mainly including VTE, sepsis and/or cancer. These results suggest that, even if sharply elevated D-dimers are a seemingly solitary finding, clinical suspicion of severe underlying disease should be maintained.

Citing Articles

Construction and validation of risk prediction models for pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients based on different machine learning methods.

Huang T, Huang Z, Peng X, Pang L, Sun J, Wu J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1308017.

PMID: 38984357 PMC: 11232034. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1308017.


Infective Endocarditis in Pregnancy Diagnosed Early Based on Elevated D-Dimer Levels: A Case Report.

Yamano K, Kitano A, Hamaguchi F, Nagura M, Nakajima M Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61803.

PMID: 38975424 PMC: 11227267. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61803.


Prediction of in-hospital death following acute type A aortic dissection.

Chen J, Bai Y, Liu H, Qin M, Guo Z Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1143160.

PMID: 37064704 PMC: 10090540. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143160.


A novel prognostic model based on ferritin and nomogram-revised risk index could better stratify patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.

Liu X, Liang Y, Shen Z, Wei L, Yang J, Piao Y Cancer Med. 2023; 12(9):10660-10671.

PMID: 36924334 PMC: 10225229. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5820.


Relationship between baseline D-dimer and prognosis in Japanese patients with venous thromboembolism: Insights from the J'xactly study.

Migita S, Okumura Y, Fukuda I, Nakamura M, Yamada N, Takayama M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1074661.

PMID: 36844735 PMC: 9949378. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1074661.