» Articles » PMID: 27960105

Evaluation and Comparison of Diffusion MR Methods for Measuring Apparent Transcytolemmal Water Exchange Rate Constant

Overview
Journal J Magn Reson
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Dec 14
PMID 27960105
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two diffusion-based approaches, CG (constant gradient) and FEXI (filtered exchange imaging) methods, have been previously proposed for measuring transcytolemmal water exchange rate constant k, but their accuracy and feasibility have not been comprehensively evaluated and compared. In this work, both computer simulations and cell experiments in vitro were performed to evaluate these two methods. Simulations were done with different cell diameters (5, 10, 20μm), a broad range of k values (0.02-30s) and different SNR's, and simulated k's were directly compared with the ground truth values. Human leukemia K562 cells were cultured and treated with saponin to selectively change cell transmembrane permeability. The agreement between measured k's of both methods was also evaluated. The results suggest that, without noise, the CG method provides reasonably accurate estimation of k especially when it is smaller than 10s, which is in the typical physiological range of many biological tissues. However, although the FEXI method overestimates k even with corrections for the effects of extracellular water fraction, it provides reasonable estimates with practical SNR's and more importantly, the fitted apparent exchange rate AXR showed approximately linear dependence on the ground truth k. In conclusion, either CG or FEXI method provides a sensitive means to characterize the variations in transcytolemmal water exchange rate constant k, although the accuracy and specificity is usually compromised. The non-imaging CG method provides more accurate estimation of k, but limited to large volume-of-interest. Although the accuracy of FEXI is compromised with extracellular volume fraction, it is capable of spatially mapping k in practice.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive characterization of tumor therapeutic response with simultaneous mapping cell size, density, and transcytolemmal water exchange.

Shi D, Li S, Liu F, Jiang X, Wu L, Chen L ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39130198 PMC: 11312621.


Disentangling the effects of restriction and exchange with diffusion exchange spectroscopy.

Cai T, Williamson N, Ravin R, Basser P Front Phys. 2023; 10.

PMID: 37063496 PMC: 10104504. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.805793.


Water exchange rates measure active transport and homeostasis in neural tissue.

Williamson N, Ravin R, Cai T, Falgairolle M, ODonovan M, Basser P PNAS Nexus. 2023; 2(3):pgad056.

PMID: 36970182 PMC: 10032361. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad056.


Measuring water exchange on a preclinical MRI system using filter exchange and diffusion time dependent kurtosis imaging.

Li C, Fieremans E, Novikov D, Ge Y, Zhang J Magn Reson Med. 2022; 89(4):1441-1455.

PMID: 36404493 PMC: 9892228. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29536.


Improving MR cell size imaging by inclusion of transcytolemmal water exchange.

Jiang X, Devan S, Xie J, Gore J, Xu J NMR Biomed. 2022; 35(12):e4799.

PMID: 35794795 PMC: 10124991. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4799.


References
1.
Xu J, Does M, Gore J . Numerical study of water diffusion in biological tissues using an improved finite difference method. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(7):N111-26. PMC: 2634837. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/N01. View

2.
Sonderby C, Lundell H, Sogaard L, Dyrby T . Apparent exchange rate imaging in anisotropic systems. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 72(3):756-62. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24957. View

3.
Li H, Li K, Zhang X, Jiang X, Zu Z, Zaiss M . R1 correction in amide proton transfer imaging: indication of the influence of transcytolemmal water exchange on CEST measurements. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28(12):1655-62. PMC: 4715641. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3428. View

4.
Amiry-Moghaddam M, Ottersen O . The molecular basis of water transport in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(12):991-1001. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1252. View

5.
Ackerman J, Neil J . The use of MR-detectable reporter molecules and ions to evaluate diffusion in normal and ischemic brain. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23(7):725-33. PMC: 3080095. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1530. View